FTC, 3 Loan Orignators Settle Charges Of TILA & Reg Z Violations; Deceptively Advertising "Teaser" Rates

The Federal Trade Commission announced:

• Three mortgage loan advertisers that allegedly deceptively touted low monthly payments and low rates without fully disclosing loan terms have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that their ads violated federal law.(1)

• According to the FTC, the ads represented that people could receive mortgage loans at the terms prominently stated in the ads. However, in violation of the FTC Act, the ads allegedly failed to disclose, or failed to disclose adequately, that the advertised low monthly payment amounts and low rates apply only for a limited time, after which they will increase, and that the advertised payment amounts and rates did not include the interest owed each month, with the interest added to the total loan balance.

For more, see Three Home Loan Advertisers Settle FTC Charges; Failed to Disclose Key Loan Terms in Ads.

(1) For links to the relevant court documents in the three cases (ie. consent orders, original FTC complaints, etc.), see:

• American Nationwide Mortgage Co.;
• Michael Gendrolis, doing business as Good Life Funding; and
• Shiva Venture Group, Inc., doing business as Innova Financial Group.

NY AG Settles With Two Mortgage Brokerages, Files Suit Against Another For Alleged Race-Based, Discriminatory Lending Practices

From the Office of the New York Atttorney General:

• Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo [Monday] announced results of a landmark investigation with the New York State Department of Banking into discriminatory practices in the mortgage brokerage industry.

• In the first law enforcement action of its kind in New York State, two mortgage brokerage companies – HCI Mortgage and Consumer One Mortgage – will collectively pay $665,000 in restitution to approximately 455 Black and Latino borrowers who were illegally charged higher fees than similarly-situated White borrowers. The companies collectively operate more than 20 branches throughout New York State.

• The Attorney General also filed a lawsuit in federal district court against another mortgage brokerage company – U.S. Capital Funding, LLC – that engaged in similar discriminatory practices.(1)

Go here for the NY AG press release: Attorney General Cuomo Announces Groundbreaking Agreement With Major Mortgage Brokers Who Discriminated Against Minority Customers (HCI and Consumer One to Pay Over $650,000 in Restitution After Illegally Charging Black and Latino Customers Higher Brokerage Fees; Cuomo Sues U.S. Capital Funding for Similar Discriminatory Practices).

Go here, Go here, and Go here for other posts on alleged race bias in real estate transactions.

(1) According to the NY AG press release, unlike HCI and Consumer One, U.S. Capital Funding failed to agree to provide appropriate relief to victims. Consequently, the Attorney General filed a lawsuit seeking restitution for over 100 minority borrowers and a court order requiring the company to cease its discriminatory practices. DiscriminationPredatoryLendingAlpha

City Of Memphis Joins Shelby County; Gives Go-Ahead For Discrimination Suit Targeting Major Home Lenders

In Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Commercial Appeal reports:

• City Council members on Tuesday approved a resolution authorizing the city to file suit against national lenders who they say created a foreclosure crisis in Memphis and Shelby County that disproportionately affected African-Americans.

• The resolution alleges lenders engaged in "deceptive" and "discriminatory" lending practices targeted at the black community and "other select groups" that caused "substantial" and "irreparable" harm to neighborhoods and the governments.

• The Shelby County Commission recently approved a similar resolution (see Shelby commissioners authorize lawsuits against mortgage lenders), claiming the foreclosure epidemic has devastated neighborhoods, slashed property values, eroded the tax base and drained local government coffers because of a host of direct and indirect costs.

• "They have caused property values to plummet," said Webb Brewer from Memphis Area Legal Services, which is working with the city and county on the lawsuit. "As the property values go down, the property taxes go down. There are a lot of increased costs, like police and fire protection."

For more, see Council says OK to city lawsuit (Resolution alleges lenders targeted black community).

Go here, Go here, and Go here for other posts on alleged discrimination in real estate transactions. DiscriminationPredatoryLendingAlpha

Foreclosure Not A Basis For Tenant Evictions In San Francisco

In California, a story in San Francisco Bay Guardian serves as a reminder that, within the city of San Francisco, it's illegal for a bank or broker or anyone else to evict a tenant just because the ownership of a building changed hands, including an ownership change due to foreclosure.

• [I]n an effort to promote tenant-rights awareness, the Assessor-Recorder's Office will be circulating letters to inform tenants when a landlord has received a 'Notice of Default' — the precursor to a foreclosure.

• "According to San Francisco law," the letter says, "it is illegal for the new owner to ask you to leave without just cause or shut off your utilities." Since most of the renters who have been evicted by this latest ruse don't speak English, the letter is being circulated in English, Spanish, and Chinese.

***

• The law may seem confusing, and in some cities, a foreclosure may mean the tenants have to go. But that's not the case in San Francisco. The city's rent ordinance requires "just cause" for eviction — and a change of ownership, no matter the cause, is not in itself a just cause.

• The San Francisco Rent Board's literature makes that clear: "The Court of Appeal held in Gross v. Superior Court (1985) ... that foreclosure, like any other sale, is not a just cause for eviction under the Rent Ordinance and provides no basis to force the tenant to leave."

For the story, see Don't leave your home (A foreclosure can be tough on tenants — but it shouldn't lead to eviction).

Foreclosure Scams Growing, Continue Hitting Northern California

In Napa County, California, the St. Helena Star reports:

• Rising foreclosure rates in Napa County are supplying scam artists with a steady stream of victims. Willing to do anything to keep their homes and get out of mortgages they cannot afford, these homeowners’ desperation is fodder for deceit.

• “It’s certainly a growing problem, not just here in Napa but throughout the state and country,” Napa County District Attorney Gary Lieberstein said. “It is a reflection of the mortgage scams that we’ve seen coming around nationwide, as well as the financial status of our economy right now.”

***

• [Associate director for Fair Housing Napa Valley Steve] Cogswell said it is impossible to know how many people in Napa County have been targets of foreclosure scams. Fair Housing Napa Valley has had 55 cases in the last 12 months, but “that’s just the people that happen to end up coming in to us,” he said. Many times, the scams go unreported, either because victims don’t realize they’ve been victimized or because they don’t know where to go.

For more, see Foreclosure schemes growing.

Missouri AG Brings Civil Suit Against Homebuilder For Allegedly Pocketing Customer Cash & Either Failing To Perform Work Or Doing So In Shoddy Manner

From the Office of the Missouri Attorney General:

• The Franklin County Circuit Court has entered an order against homebuilder Jason Woods that prevents him from doing any home repair or construction in Missouri while a lawsuit brought by the Attorney General's Office is pending.

• The lawsuit,(1) filed in October, alleges that Woods, who does business as Timber Ridge Construction, took money for home repair or construction projects from consumers but then either failed to do the work or did the work in a shoddy manner.

For the Missouri AG press release, see Preliminary injunction prevents homebuilder accused of fraud from doing business while AG lawsuit is pending.

For more on homeowners left in the lurch due to actions by builders/contractors, go here, go here, go here, go here, and go here.

(1) According to the Missouri AG press release, the lawsuit alleges that Woods entered into a contract with one consumer in which Woods was paid a total of $138,951 to construct a new home on property owned by the consumer. However, Woods allegedly failed to complete the construction of the house per the specifications listed in the agreement; and the work completed was also alleged to have been done using poor workmanship. The lawsuit also alleges the defendant entered into a contract with another homeowner couple to construct a storage building on the couple's property. The couple paid Woods a total of $30,000 to construct the structure, but he failed to do so, according to the AG's press release. StiffingContractorsTheta

Massachusetts AG Continues Effort Against Housing Discrimination

Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley's Office has recently issued news releases in connection with its efforts targeting housing discrimination:

• AG Coakley Obtains Consent Judgment Against Cambridge Realty Company in Housing Discrimination Case: Resolved claims that company discriminated against a disabled Cambridge resident by refusing to rent her an apartment because it did not want to accept the lease requirements of the state-assisted housing program. The consent judgment permanently prohibits Oxford Street Realty, Inc. and its President, Jeffrey Indeck, from discriminating against tenants who have federal or state housing subsidies and requires defendants to pay the tenant $35,000 in damages.

• AG Coakley Obtains Consent Judgment Against Pittsfield Property Owner in Housing Discrimination Case: Resolves claims that Wahconah Grove Realty Trust and its property manager, Douglas Malins, violated state antidiscrimination laws by discriminating against a tenant on the basis of race. The defendants have agreed to pay $10,000 to the tenant as part of the settlement of the case. The complaint alleged that Malins prohibited a tenant’s grandson, who is biracial, from visiting her apartment and that he interfered with the tenant’s right to have African-American guests at her apartment.

• AG Coakley Obtains Consent Judgment in Sexual Harassment Case Against Property Owner and Management Company: Resolves claims against the management company and property owner of a 250-unit apartment complex in Cambridge involving allegations of unlawful discrimination against a tenant and her daughter by allowing an employee to sexually harass them.

Feds Put Squeeze On Vegas Landlords Accused Of Discriminating Against Families With Children; Tenant Gets $30K Settlement To Resolve Claims

In Las Vegas, Nevada, the Las Vegas Sun reports:

• The federal government recently settled a complaint against the owners of Las Vegas apartments who allegedly discriminated against families, the third such case in the valley in two years.

• The repeated cases involving hundreds of apartments mean “there definitely is discrimination against families with children” in the Las Vegas Valley, said Chuck Hauptman, a representative of the Housing and Urban Development Department’s San Francisco office of fair housing and equal opportunity.

• He said the agency wants valley landlords to be on notice that this is illegal, a message that’s especially crucial when families with children are among the many seeking rental housing in the wake of the valley’s foreclosure crisis.

• In the most recent case, which was settled in October, HUD, rather than the victim, had filed the complaint, indicating the alleged discrimination was flagrant and easy to prove.(1)

For the rest of the story, see U.S. strikes at landlord bias against children (HUD gets payments to families, message to apartment owners).

(1) According to the story, the allegations were resolved when the landlord agreed to pay the tenant $30,000 and to set aside money for any other victims, as well as to stop the policy of not renting to children. In another case, HUD allegations were reportedly resolved when the landlord agreed to pay $75,000 total to four families the apartment management evicted or attempted to evict. Some of the settlement money was set aside to compensate any victims who come forth in the future.

Arizona Man Faces Charges Of Pocketing Upfront Fees For Allegedly Phony Loan Modification, Foreclosure Help

In Glendale, Arizona, KNXV-TV Channel 15 reports:

• Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard announced Wednesday that a Glendale man has been indicted on charges related to a mortgage assistance scam.(1) Peoria police arrested Bobby John Herrera, 33, late Tuesday.

***

• Investigators said Herrera solicited 10 Valley homeowners facing foreclosure by making fraudulent claims that he could modify mortgage terms or provide other assistance to help them keep their homes. Herrera often charged the victims upfront fees of $1,245, according to the Attorney General's Office. The suspect is alleged to have not provided any foreclosure relief assistance or mortgage loan modifications as promised.

For more, see Attorney General: Glendale man victimized struggling homeowners.

From the Arizona Attorney General's office:

• Indictment: State of Arizona v. Herrera,
• Press Release: Glendale Man Indicted for Mortgage Loan ‘Assistance’ Scam.

(1) Herrera has been indicted on:

• one count of fraudulent schemes and artifices (ie. knowingly obtaining any benefit by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises or material omissions, pursuant to a scheme or artifice to defraud, in violation of § 13-2310, of the Arizona Revised Statutes),
• one count of money laundering (A.R.S. § 13-2317 ),
• one count of illegal control of an enterprise (A.R.S. § 13-2312(A)), and
• five counts of theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802(A)(1)).

Foreclosure Rescue Arrangement Leaves Los Angeles Homeowner Facing Eviction

In Los Angeles, California, the CBS Evening News reports:

• Alexendria Craig's house is full of memories. It was her parents' home and she inherited it when they died. A picture of her great grandfather sits on the mantle. Now she is about to lose that home after taking out a series of high interest loans that have left her hopelessly in debt.

***

• Desperate to hold onto her house, she answered a slick sounding ad that turned out to be too good to be true. Craig agreed to pay $30,000 and to share title on her house to a foreclosure rescue company. The company said it would use equity in her house to pay off her debts, and that her credit would be repaired. After a year she thought she'd get her house back.

***

• Her house is in foreclosure, and next week she's facing eviction. Both the foreclosure rescue company and the bank foreclosing on her house deny any wrongdoing.

For the story, see For Desperate Homeowners, Scams Abound (How A Company Promising Help Cost One Woman Her American Dream). Go here for video. loan modification

St. Paul Homeowner Facing Foreclosure Opts For Free City Housing Counselor For Help; Proposal From Loan Modification Firm Didn't Feel Right, She Says

In St. Paul, Minnesota, Minnesota Public Radio reports:

• When a man called Crystal Brown out of the blue promising to modify her loan, the St. Paul single working mother of three thought he was a godsend. "He was very smooth, very nice, very understanding, not critical," Brown said. "He would lead you to believe he's 100 percent on your side, like he's really fighting for you."

***

• He identified himself as an employee of KirkLand Young, a loan modification company based in Miami Beach. Brown agreed to let him fax over some paperwork, and she almost signed the contract. But once she read it, Brown saw that she would have to pay a non-refundable fee of $500. If she accepted the new mortgage, she would have to spend an additional $1,200.

***

• She said something didn't feel right about the arrangement. Brown never sent in the papers. Instead, she sought help from a foreclosure counselor with the city of St. Paul, who offered to work with the lender at no cost.

For the story, see Companies vow to change mortgage terms -- for a price (Loan-modification companies can charge thousands of dollars for this service, even though many nonprofits will do it for free. Housing advocates say the firms represent the latest form of industry predators).

Go here for the contract Crystal Brown refused to sign.

Oregon Equity Stripper Cops Plea; Now Faces Foreclosure Himself

In Portland, Oregon, Willamette Weekly reports:

• Larry Jason Somera did something a week before Christmas that rarely happens in Multnomah County Circuit Court—he pleaded guilty to a mortgage-related crime.

***

• Somera, a 35-year-old former mortgage broker, first attracted the attention of law enforcement after two 2006 home purchases from the elderly and disabled. In one deal, he and a partner bought the 1,300-square-foot Northeast Portland home of Evelyn Allen, a 73-year-old blind woman who faced foreclosure. They made a gross profit of $155,000, most of which they paid to Allen only after Allen’s family sued.

• That same year, Somera and a partner bought the St. Johns home of an 80-year-old Portland man suffering from dementia. They paid $125,000, $45,000 less than it was worth, according to court records. After the man’s financial adviser challenged the purchase in court, Somera and his partner gave the home back.

• Shen ultimately charged Somera with first-degree forgery, a Class C felony, for concocting a bogus rental agreement as collateral for the loan on a third property. [...] Somera, whose pitch in 2006 to Allen was rescue from foreclosure, now also faces the loss of his home.

For more, see Grounded Vulture (One “foreclosure-rescuer” pleads guilty in 2008. Will there be more in 2009?).

For an earlier story on this case, see Rescue Me (A Portland Cop is targeting foreclosure vultures).

San Diego-Area Foreclosure Rescue Operator Faces Felony Charges For Allegedly Screwing 17 Homeowners In 150 Year Old Land Patent Scam

In San Diego, California, KGTV Channel 10 reports:

• A man accused of stealing more than $100,000 from people in a land patent foreclosure scam pleaded not guilty Wednesday to numerous felony charges involving the 17 alleged victims. Larry Smith, 60, allegedly told people who came to his seminars that if they gave him thousands of dollars, he would help them buy a land patent so the bank couldn't foreclose on it.

***

• Five others are charged in the case with Smith, although only one has been arrested, [Deputy District Attorney Marlene] Coyne said. The prosecutor said she believes there are more people allegedly victimized by Smith, who have not yet come forward.(1)

For more, see Man Pleads Not Guilty In Alleged Foreclosure Scam.

For related KGTV Channel 10 reports on this case, see:

• December 22, 2008: Man Takes Alleged Land Patent Scheme To Other States (Larry Smith Accused Of Using 150-Year-Old Scam On Foreclosure Victims),
• July 17, 2008: I-Team Pursues Man Suspected In Land Patent Scheme.

(1) Smith was charged with conspiracy to commit grand theft, conspiracy to commit deceitful practices by a foreclosure consultant and numerous counts of grand theft.

Atlanta Man Faces Theft By Deception Charges For Allegedly Taking Money From 11 Homeowners Facing Foreclosure, Failing To Deilver On Promises

In Atlanta, Georgia, Fox5 News reports that a man who made money off of people about to lose their homes to foreclosure has been arrested.

Dwayne Green, of Maximus Investment Group, has been charged with one felony count of theft by deception for taking $18,000 from one homeowner facing foreclosure, and one misdemeanor count of theft by deception for pocketing lesser amounts from ten other financially strapped homeowners. He failed to deliver on promises to help save homeowners out of foreclosure.

For the story (video only), see I-Team Maximus Arrest. loan modification

Mortgage Payoff "To Do" List

In a recent Q&A column, attorney/syndicated real estate writer Benny L. Kass gives this "to do" list when paying off a mortgage:

1. Make sure that your mortgage/deed of trust is formally released from the land records in the county where your house is located. Ask your former lender to confirm that they arranged for this release (If you are having trouble determining whether the release/satisfaction was filed, the local recorder of deeds may be of assistance.),
2. You should get your original promissory note and deed of trust returned to you, marked "paid and cancelled;"(1)
3. Advise your county real estate tax office to start sending you the real estate tax bills;
4. For those who had automatic bank withdrawals to pay your mortgage, make sure to stop these payments immediately.

For those of you looking to take advantage of the current low fixed rate mortgages available and are thinking of refinancing, you might want to keep the foregoing points in mind.

Source: Real Estate Mailbag (last Q&A in the article).

(1) I wonder how many homeowners actually realize that they are entitled to get back their original promissory note. Also, I wonder how many would be successful in getting back their original note nowadays, given that many of the geniuses in the mortgage industry (ie. lenders, servicers, securitizers, Wall Street wizards, etc.) never bothered to physically keep track of the loan documents after the mortgage was consummated, and have no clue whether they actually lost them, or simply forgot where they stashed them (possibly in a dumpster).

For an example of how clueless some in the mortgage industry are, see The Associated Press: American Home under fire over loan files, where a mortgage lender, through its legal counsel, makes an idiotic request of a bankruptcy court for permission to actually dump the original documents for 490,000 mortgage loans. KappaMtgDocsMissing

Difficulty Tracing Title To Home Involving Securitized Foreclosed Mortgage Stalls House Closing

In Minneapolis, Minnesota, FOX9 reports:

• A Twin Cities couple is hoping to turn a foreclosed home into a home, but it has not been easy. Three different closing dates have fallen through. [...] In the Waite Park neighborhood in northeast Minneapolis, a little cottage on Benjamin Street has been sitting empty since spring. Heather Playman and her husband would love to buy it. In fact, they even have a purchase agreement, picking it up two months ago for a relative steal at $165,000.

• But the bank won't close on the deal. The problem is with the paperwork: the title and the deed. Wachovia used to own the house, now it's Fannie Mae. The city of Minneapolis says it’s a common problem that keeps hundreds of homes in limbo. "Many mortgages were bought and sold between lenders over and over again and it is difficult to trace the title."(1)

For more, see Bank Ownership of Foreclosed Homes Causing Confusion (Closing dates missed on NE Minneapolis home owned by Fannie Mae).

(1) Given the gigantic mess created by the mortgage lending industry in this regard, I wonder how many in the title insurance industry (ie. underwriters, agents, closers, etc.) there are who are having a problem insuring the titles to homes that have a recent foreclosure appearing in the chain of title. Based on this story, there apparently is at least one who's having a problem. Are there any others??? KappaMtgDocsMissing

Colorado Man Cops Plea To One Count Of Forgery In Alleged Mortgage Scam; Gets Free Pass From Prosecution In Cases Involving 15 Other Properties

In Weld County, Colorado, the Greeley Tribune reports:

• A Greeley man who holds himself out as a real estate broker and builder and is a defendant in a civil fraud case(1) pleaded guilty to forgery [...] in exchange for immunity on other mortgage crimes. Ernest Salazar Jr., 49, pleaded to the felony [...] and faces from one to three years behind bars.

***

• Weld District Attorney Ken Buck said he will ask for jail time but would not discuss specifics. He said he had been talking with Salazar’s attorney prior to the grand jury indictment against Salazar, and agreed to pursue only one felony charge. “I think that our resources are best spent pursuing the other targets we have identified,” Buck said. “I’d say stay tuned.” Buck said he couldn’t elaborate about who else may have been involved.

• Salazar said he would plead guilty to forgery if the Weld District Attorney’s Office agreed not to pursue charges in cases involving 15 properties(2) he worked with through his businesses, Sunset Construction, Sunrise Mortgage, A-1 Action Construction and All-Pro Mortgage.

For more, see Greeley man pleads in forgery case in deal with Weld DA.

(1) According to the story, the civil case against Salazar was filed in February, and alleges that he defrauded a man and other property owners in a series of real estate flipping schemes throughout Greeley and Windsor, designed to either steal equity, use others’ credit to obtain loans and skim off the top, and flat out steal money. Reportedly, the civil suit claims that the damage done to individual investors exceeds $800,000.

(2) Salazar's ostensibly sweet plea bargain may have possibly been obtained as a result of his "winning the race to the prosecutor's office" - which has been described as a natural phenomenon that arises whenever the government has multiple targets in its crosshairs. In this case, Salazar, the first "fish" to get to the prosecutor, negotiates a great plea deal for himself in exchange for an agreement to "sing" against the other "fish" (ie. his confederates in the alleged scam). The more "fish" Salazar can help the prosecutor "reel in" (through convictions), the less time he'll have to spend in the "frying pan" (ie. prison) when the "fish fry" takes place (ie. sentencing day).

Using Statute Of Limitations To Wipe Out Lenders' Right To Foreclose A Mortgage?

In a recent story on MSNBC.com profiling Florida consumer foreclosure attorney April Charney and her approach to defending homeowners facing foreclosure, a point was made on the possible use of the statute of limitations to terminate a foreclosing lender's right to foreclose:

• Charney said that in a number of her cases, once there is no longer an ability for the loan servicer to profit, the foreclosure “just goes to sleep, and unless I’m going to pursue it, nobody’s setting hearings, nobody’s pursuing anything to get it to trial.”

• After five years, which is the statute of limitations to enforce a contract in Florida,(1) she can try to help her clients own their homes mortgage-free, Charney said. The first opportunity for her to help clients do that may arise next year.

• And that legal limbo is where the lion’s share of her cases stand now, Charney said. So far this year, she has achieved two “workouts” and lost two cases. “Many, many, many” of the rest are in sleep mode or getting a single filing each year by plaintiffs’ attorneys just to keep them alive.

For the story, see 'Angel' of foreclosure defense bedevils lenders (Florida attorney trains hundreds of others to help troubled borrowers) (for the entire story on one web page, try here).

(1) Sec. 95.11(2)(c), 95.281(1)(a), Florida Statutes. KappaMtgDocsMissing

Lack Of Diligence Means Another Process Server Screw-Up, Another Void Foreclosure

A 2006 decision of a Florida appeals court adds a little fuel to the fire for those who believe that screw-ups by process servers (as well as attorneys for foreclosing lenders who, contrary to what they may think, have some responsibility for supervising the actions of a process server) in the course of serving homeowners with the lawsuit paperwork (ie. summons and complaint) in foreclosure proceedings are not all that uncommon.

The case involved a permanent resident of Canada who owned a second home in Spring Hill, Florida, and who was facing foreclosure on that home. At the time of the attempted service of process, the home was unoccupied. Because the process server couldn't find the homeowner after a couple of attempts at the premises, and an attempt at a second location, a decision was made to serve the homeowner by publication of a legal notice in the local newspaper.(1)

In reversing the lower court and deciding that service of process was no good in this case, the court ruled that the process server failed to meet the minimum requirements for conducting a "diligent search and inquiry" for the whereabouts of the homeowner prior to resorting to service by publication.(2)

For the details on the process server's lack of diligence in conducting a search and inquiry in connection with the homeowner's whereabouts in this case (sorry, no "easy-to-read" media report for this story; court decision only), see Godsell v. United Guar. Residential Ins., 923 So. 2d 1209; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3884; 31 Fla. L. Weekly D 812 (5th DCA 2006).

Go here for other posts on foreclosures involving faulty notifications to property owners.

Go here for other posts on process server screw ups.

(1) Pursuant to Sections 49.021-.041, Florida Statutes.

(2) The court indicated that the plaintiff must prove that it made “an honest and conscientious effort, reasonably appropriate to the circumstances, to acquire the information necessary to fully comply with the controlling statutes,” and that "it is basic that to constitute diligent search and inquiry to discover the whereabouts of a party, that inquiry should be made of persons likely or presumed to known [sic] such whereabouts." foreclosure faulty notice ScrewUpProcessServing

Attorney Malpractice For Obtaining Loan Modification From Lender Who Can't Prove It Owns The Promissory Note?

An article in the Decenber, 2008 issue of Trial Magazine highlights problems faced by lenders as a result of the mortgage securitization process that leaves them in a difficult spot whether they're attempting a foreclosure action against, or a loan modification with, a financially strapped homeowner. It also raises a question regarding an attorney's professional responsibility when representing a homeowner in these situations.

• [B]ecause of lenders’ bundling and reselling of mortgages, [promissory] notes are often lost, misplaced, or corrupted. As a result, many lenders can’t prove that they are owed payments and entitled to foreclose.

***

• “Losing a note is like losing cash,” said Mitchell Roth, a lawyer in Sherman Oaks, California. “The right to payment depends, with limited exceptions, upon the actual possession of the note. To defend against a foreclosure, the first line of defense is, ‘Show me the note.’ And show me how you have the right to payment under the note by proper endorsement or assignment.”

***

• Roth said confusion about the note holder is one reason lawyers should counsel their clients to avoid loan workouts or other negotiations offered by their banks or mortgage companies.

• “Why should we renegotiate unless we know that we are negotiating with the actual holder of the note?” he said. “In fact, I think lawyers are committing malpractice if they are negotiating with an entity that is not the original holder in due course in possession of the instrument.”

For more, see Homeowners bank on new ways to fight foreclosures (article reproduced and appearing on the website of The Consumer Warning Network).

In related posts, see:

• 12-29-08: Foreclosing Lender Can't Prove Ownership Of The Note? So What's The Big Deal???,
• 12-28-08: Judges, Homeowner Attorneys Begin To Wonder How To Do A Loan Modification When Lender Can't Prove Ownership Of Promissory Note?KappaMtgDocsMissing

Federal Prison Sentences Expected To Get Stiffer As Tanking Real Estate Market Drives Up Lenders' Losses From Mortgage Fraud

Buried in a recent story in the South Florida Sun Sentinel is an observation that prison sentences in federal mortgage fraud prosecutions will begin becoming stiffer than they have been:

• [U]ntil now, the punishments meted out to mortgage fraud offenders have been relatively mild — usually less than five years' imprisonment and sometimes nothing more than probation.

• That's because under federal sentencing guidelines, penalities in such cases are tied to the amount of documented financial loss. When home prices were climbing, fraudsters generally paid off their loans and lenders had no direct losses.

• Now the foreclosure crisis is driving up losses, resulting in stiffer punishment. In [one recent] case, prosecutors and defense lawyers agreed [a mortgage scam defendant's] crimes cost lenders at least $1 million because many of the properties he purchased were subsequently foreclosed on at a loss [he received eight years in prison].

Source: Mortgage fraud cases in South Florida might bring stiffer sentences (Judge imposes 8-year term, saying he wants to deter others).

HELOC Freeze Puts Squeeze On Family's College Tuition Plans

In Algonquin, Illinois, the Chicago Sun Times reports:

• Jim and Cindy Ranallo are determined to give their two sons one thing they don't have: a four-year college degree. But the home equity line of credit they were relying on to get both boys through school was unexpectedly frozen by JPMorgan Chase weeks before their elder son's recent tuition payment was due.

***

• The Ranallos' situation is a familiar one for hundreds of thousands of Americans who have found their home equity credit lines frozen or reduced this year. Their struggle to send their children to college also is familiar to parents patching funds together for higher education, constantly worried they will come up short.

***

• Hysterical after opening the bank's letter, Cindy Ranallo feared her son would be kicked out of school because they couldn't afford it. A [college] official reassured the Ranallos that they would find a way for their son to stay, offering additional student loans, which the family accepted.

For more, see Frozen home equity loan hurts family (ECONOMY'S VICTIMS: Freezing of home equity loan threatens to kill Algonquin family's dream of sending sons to college).

The U.S. Office of Thrift Supervision recently issued a six-page letter of guidance which generally explains what obligations lenders have in connection with the freezing of home-equity lines of credit [HELOCs].

Go here for other posts on Frozen HELOCs.

More On Anticipated Home Mortgage "Cram Downs" In Bankruptcy

The Wall Street Journal reports:

• Mortgage lenders who wake up Thursday with a New Year's hangover are likely to face another headache soon: The effort to give bankruptcy judges the power to rewrite mortgages is gaining steam.

• The banking industry hoped the mortgage "cram-down"(1) measure died when Congress removed it from the $700 billion bailout bill that passed in October. But it has been gathering momentum in Democrat-controlled Washington, as evidence emerges that current voluntary foreclosure-prevention programs are falling short.

***

• "It is absolutely clear that voluntary modification is just not working," says Rep. Brad Miller, a North Carolina Democrat. "Every plan that Congress has passed, we do it and nothing happens."

For more, see Mortgage 'Cram-Downs' Loom as Foreclosures Mount (may require subscription; if no subscription, go here - then click link for the story).

(1) In a cram-down, a judge modifies a loan, often reducing principal so a borrower can afford it. Lenders hate it because they have to absorb the loss. Bankruptcy judges currently have the ability to modify certain personal loans and even mortgages on vacation homes, but they can not cram-down mortgages on primary residences.

Lenders Accused In Housing Court Of Dumping Blighted Foreclosures Onto Real Estate Market Shop For Friendlier Forum; Move Cases To Federal Court

In Cleveland, Ohio, The Washington Independent reports:

• The fight that neighborhoods in Cleveland are launching against banks that dump vacant and vandalized foreclosed homes back onto the real estate market received a bit of a setback, [...]. A private, non-profit housing advocacy group had filed suit in local housing court to force the banks to clean up their properties before selling them, or to demolish them entirely. But the banks - Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo - convinced a judge to move the suit to federal court.

***

• The move to federal court is more than just an arcane legal development. The neighborhood group wants the case heard in housing court because it validates what has become increasingly clear in the foreclosure crisis: Banks are property owners, with all the responsibilities that come with it. As they foreclose on houses and their inventories of bank-owned properties swell, banks try to dodge this reality by blaming servicers and paying lawyers to get them out of housing court.

• The same thing happened in Cincinnati recently, where the local legal aid agency filed suit in housing court, but the case was moved to a federal court instead.

For more, see Banks with Deep Pockets Dodge Foreclosure Damages.

See also, Lawsuit Targets Banks With Novel Tactic (Advocacy Group Takes Grievances to Housing Court):

• [C]leveland and other cities are “looking at old bodies of law to address new problems,” [University of Connecticut law professor] Patricia McCoy said, because they are trying to fight foreclosures with any tools they can. Cleveland has taken legal action previously over foreclosures. The city in January sued 21 investment banks, including Wells Fargo and Deutsche Bank, and accused them of creating and enabling the subprime crisis. The suit was filed in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas court. The latest suit differs in that it was filed in housing court. BetaVacantForeclosure

Connecticut Warns Consumers Against Unsolicited Mortgage, Credit Card Debt Assistance; False Offers Of Help Are A "Scavenger Hunt" Says State AG

From the Office of the Connecticut Attorney General:

• Attorney General Richard Blumenthal issued an urgent consumer warning [last week] about unsolicited calls to consumers offering reduced rates on mortgages or credit card debt.

***

• "Our advice to consumers: hang up on unsolicited offers," Blumenthal said. "This scam victimizes our most vulnerable citizens -- homeowners desperate to save their families and escape financial ruin. This reprehensible ruse -- false promises of reduced rates on mortgage and debt -- is actually a scavenger hunt for private, personal information on consumers that may be illegally exploited. Consumers who divulge details hopeful for better lives will find only deeper financial ruin."

For the Connecticut AG press release, see Attorney General Issues Consumer Alert On Mortgage And Debt Rescue Scam. loan modification

Loan Modification Services Prohibited In Vermont Unless Licensed, Say State Officials

In Montpelier, Vermont, The Burlington Free Press reports:

• Homeowners having trouble making mortgage payments or facing foreclosure should be cautious when offers of assistance come unsolicited, requiring up-front fees, or are high-pressure sells, officials for the Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration said.

• (BISHCA) has received inquiries and complaints about so-called foreclosure “rescue” services. While it is not inherently illegal to offer these services, the person doing it must be licensed with BISHCA as a lender, mortgage broker, or debt adjuster, said BISHCA officials.

For the story, see State: Be wary of foreclosure rescue services.

More On Philly Deed Theft Problem

In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, The Intelligencer reports:

• [P]hiladelphia has become a hot spot for deed theft in the past couple of years, said [Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds Nancy J.] Becker. She recalled an incident where homeowners left for their winter home in Florida only to return to the city in the spring to find all of their furniture and possessions gone and a family living in their home who thought they had rightfully bought the property.

• “In Philadelphia, it's so bad that the president judge designated two judges, and all they hear is land-fraud charges.”

For more, see New law helps limit deed fraud.

For an old NBC10 (Philadelphia) television story in which investigative reporter Lu Ann Cahn "steals" the homes of Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, as well as the homes of the Philadelphia mayor and the Pennsylvania Speaker of the House of Representatives to highlight the deed theft problem in Philadelphia, see Stolen Homes.

Go here, Go here, go here, go here, and go here for other posts related to deed or refinancing scams by forgery, swindle, etc. KappaDeedTheft

Shelby County Commisioners Give Go-Ahead For Filing Race Bias, Predatory Lending Suit Against Major Lenders

In Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Commercial Appeal reports:

• Shelby County commissioners approved a resolution [last week] authorizing the county to file suit against the national lenders who, officials say, gave out risky, high-interest rate loans and enabled a foreclosure crisis in Shelby County.

• The resolution alleges that these major national lenders engaged in "deceptive" and "discriminatory" lending practices targeted at the black community. And the resulting foreclosure epidemic has destabilized neighborhoods, eroded property values and damaged the tax base -- costing county and Memphis city government millions in tax revenues.

***

• Webb Brewer, the director of advocacy for Memphis Area Legal Services, who will help the city and county prosecute, said the 10 or so national banks that gave out the most predatory loans will most likely be named.

For more, see Shelby commissioners authorize lawsuits against mortgage lenders (Resolution says loans targeted minorities, forced foreclosures).

See also, Memphis Daily News: Details Coming Soon for Lender Lawsuit.

Go here, Go here, and Go here for other posts on alleged race bias in real estate transactions. DiscriminationPredatoryLendingAlpha

1031 Exchange Intermediary Suspected Of Feloniously Pocketing $550K+ In Clients' Sale Proceeds Found Dead By Suicide

In Boulder Colorado, the Boulder Daily Camera reports:

• [K.C.] Schneider, who owns a commercial real estate firm in Boulder, said Wednesday he is [...] out $425,000 in real estate proceeds he gave National 1031 Exchange Service to hold while he closed on a new property.

***

• Schneider filed a complaint in October against the now-defunct holding company's owner, Debra Edwards, and earlier this month Boulder police issued a warrant for her arrest on suspicion of three felony counts of theft of more than $20,000.

• But the day before Edwards was to surrender to authorities, the 53-year-old certified public accountant and former board member of the Longmont Area Chamber of Commerce was found dead in her Longmont office. The Boulder County Coroner's Office said Wednesday that her Dec. 15 death was a suicide -- asphyxiation due to inhalation of helium.

• Edwards' death led Boulder police to close its criminal case against her. Schneider said that leaves him and two other National 1031 Exchange Service clients -- who also claim to have been bilked of tens of thousands of dollars -- out in the cold.

For more, see Suicide complicates money-recovery effort (Client says Debra Edwards' Boulder financial firm stole $425,000 from him).

Go here for other posts on problems with 1031 exchange intermediaries.

Go here, Go here, Go here, and Go here for other stories of trust account / escrow account theft of funds. EscrowRipOffAlpha

S. Florida Man, Others Charged With Using Unwitting Mother-In-Law's I.D. & Submitting Simultaneous HELOC Applications To Suck The Equity From Her Home

The U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami, Florida announced the return of a five count grand jury indictment charging eight participants(1) with a bank fraud scheme that resulted in the approval and disbursement of two home equity loans, totaling approximately $1 million. The U.S. Attorney's office said:

• According to the indictment, "Benny" Benach [and three others] decided to submit simultaneous applications for fraudulent home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”) to Bank of America and Wachovia for the total amount of $1 million, requesting $500,000 from each bank. Each HELOC application listed Benach’s mother-in-law as the purported borrower, and a home owned by Benach’s mother-in-law as the collateral. To prepare and process the HELOC applications, Benach’s mother-in-law’s name and social security number were used without her knowledge, input or authority. [...] At the time of the submission of the fraudulent HELOC applications, neither bank was made aware of the other pending HELOC application.

Among the participants charged were employees of the lenders who allegedly accepted and processed bogus loan applications.

For more, see Two Bank Insiders And Six Others Charged In Bank Fraud Scheme To Defraud Bank Of America And Wachovia Of $1M.

Go here, go here, go here, go here, and go here for other posts related to deed or refinancing scams by forgery, swindle, etc.

(1) Charged were Bienvenido “Benny” Benach, Jr., Ramon Puentes, Danny Flores, Rolando Alfonso, Jorge Nobrega, Jorge Arrieta, Sebastian Kishinevsky, and Adriana Cruz. KappaDeedTheft

Seton Hall Pro Bono Program Intervenes On Behalf Of Elderly Homeowner In Equity Stripping, Foreclosure Rescue Scam

In Newark, New Jersey, lawyers and law students from the Center for Social Justice (CSJ) at Seton Hall University School of Law have successfully vacated a foreclosure judgment against an elderly couple of were allegdly victims of a foreclosure rescue, equity stripping scam that resulted in a loss of approximately $400,000.00 in equity in their home by participating in a predatory lending/foreclosure rescue scam. CSJ believes the scam has been perpetrated on numerous other distressed homeowners in the area. The homeowners will now, along with CSJ, defend against the foreclosure.(1)

For the CSJ press release, see CSJ Stays Foreclosure, Charges Mortgage Scam.

(1) According to the press release, the Counterclaim filed on behalf of the elderly homeowners by CSJ against Third-Party defendants (a disbarred lawyer, a subprime lender, and others) includes, in part, a petition for relief for multiple violations of:

• New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act ( N.J.S.A. § 56:8-1, et seq.),
• New Jersey Civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ( N.J.S.A. § 2C:41-2( c ) ),
• New Jersey Fair Foreclosure Act ( N.J.S.A. § 2A:50-56, et seq. ), and,
• Federal Truth in Lending Act ( 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq. ).

Reportedly also included in the countersuit are a number of common law claims. The pleading also charges that the foreclosing entity, assignee U.S. Bank:

• Lacks standing to enforce the Note securing the Property because U.S. Bank is not a proper assignee and holder of the Note pursuant to N.J.S.A. § 12A:3-201 and Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code ( “UCC” );
• Is not a “holder in due course” and therefore is vicariously liable for the Webbs’ claims and defenses against the originators of the mortgage, Credit Suisse Financial Corporation and its agent, ANM Funding, LLC;
• Lacks standing to seek foreclosure because the mortgage was not assigned to it until after about four months the foreclosure action was filed. N.J.S.A. § 46:9-9 requires mortgage assignments to be in writing.

Unlicensed Practice Of Law Becomes An Issue With Some Loan Modification Firms

A recent story in The Washington Post raises an issue that could begin taking hold in targeting certain loan modification firms for engaging in illegal conduct when seeking out financially distressed homeowners:

• [T]he pitch companies make varies. But one approach includes paying a company to challenge the legality of a loan -- a process housing experts say can be long and complicated.

• Vienna-based Mortgage Analysis and Consulting, for example, charges $150 for a consultation and $250 to $500 for a preliminary audit. If the audit finds problems with the loan document, Mortgage Analysis will refer the borrower to a lawyer, who may charge an additional $2,000 retainer. If the lawyer requests a more in-depth audit, Mortgage Analysis charges up to $1,750, which clients can pay in installments.

***

• Virginia's State Bar is investigating a complaint that [the firm's founder Jose] Semidey has illegally practiced law.(1) Semidey said he makes clear he is not a lawyer and refers clients to a list of lawyers he has compiled.

For more see Firms Charge Thousands To Modify Mortgages (Nonprofits Offer Service For Free, Advocates Say).

(1) Unlicensed or unauthorized practice of law has been raised as an issue in at least two recent civil lawsuits against loan modification firms, one by the Tennessee Attorney General, and the other by the Florida Attorney General.

In addressing what constitutes the unlicensed practice of law, the Florida Supreme Court, in The Florida Bar v. We The People Forms And Service Center Of Sarasota, Inc., 883 So. 2d 1280; (Fla. 2004), relied on the following survey of its prior decisions in holding that certain activities of a non-lawyer constituted the unlicensed practice of law:

• Florida Bar v. Catarcio, 709 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 1998) (holding that a nonlawyer who has direct contact with individuals in the nature of consultation, explanation, recommendations, advice, and assistance in the provision, selection, and completion of legal forms engages in the unlicensed practice of law);

• Florida Bar v. Becerra, 661 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 1995) (enjoining a nonlawyer from advertising in any fashion that may lead a reasonable lay person to believe that the nonlawyer may offer to the public legal services, legal advice, or personal legal assistance);

• Florida Bar v. Consol. Bus. & Legal Forms, Inc., 386 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 1980) (holding that a corporation engaged in the unlicensed practice of law where its officers and stockholders were nonlawyers with no legal training who supervised and maintained a degree of control over the legal services it furnished through its lawyer employees and noting the inherent conflict of interest between the legal needs of the client and the monetary policy of the corporation and how such a business structure permits unlicensed and unregulated persons to profit from the providing of services which by law they are prohibited from providing).

Where loan modification firms offer and conduct, for homeowners, reviews of mortgage loan and other legal documents for the purpose of determining whether said documents are in compliance with the applicable lending, consumer, and other laws (Truth in Lending, HOEPA, RESPA, etc.), such services seem to fall squarely within the scope of the above survey of Florida laws and, consequently, could constitute the unlicensed / unauthorized practice of law in Florida. Assuming other states have similar case law in this regard, it may only be a matter of time before these types of non-attorney loan modification firms offering "legal reviews" or "legal analyses" of loan documents find the legality of their services being challenged throughout the country.

Colorado, California Collaborate To Shut Down Loan Modification Scams

Buried in a recent story in the Rocky Mountain News on a homeowner claiming to have been screwed out of about $3,000 by a loan modification firm is this excerpt:

• In addition to the [16 subpoenas sent to loan modification companies in Colorado, California and Arizona, Colorado director of the division of real estate Erin], Toll also recently entered into what she calls an "unprecedented collaboration," with Jeff Davi, the division of real estate director in California.

• "(Davi) has agreed to work closely with us to shut down illegal loan modification companies that prey on consumers when they are most vulnerable," Toll said. "Mr. Davi is well aware of the problem and will do everything possible to ensure Colorado consumers are not harmed by unlicensed California companies."

***

• Davi, in a phone interview Tuesday, said he is "very pleased with our relationship with Colorado and Erin," and hopes to build similar relationships with state real estate divisions across the country, because the practices have become so widespread.

• "These companies are based everywhere," Davi said. "I heard of one yesterday where a 75-year-old California woman gave her last $2,000 to a company out of Massachusetts. It is the saddest thing I ever heard."

For more, see Loan modification firms causing more problems for homeowners.

Boston Legal Aid Firm Wins $54K Jury Verdict For Tenant Illegally Booted In Foreclosure Eviction; Now Seek Triple Damages, Attorney Fee From Servicer

In Boston, Massachusetts, The Boston Globe reports on William Allen, a local man who, with the help of local law students at Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, fought back against a mortgage loan servicing company in a case involving an illegal foreclosure eviction.

• In January, after the Bank of New York, which owns the property, sent an eviction notice, Allen fought back. He filed a counterclaim, arguing that by changing the locks the bank tried to paint him as a squatter and that it intentionally did not turn on the water and heat, because it wanted him to leave.(1) Last month, after a three-day trial in Boston Housing Court, a jury awarded Allen $54,000 for his ordeal.(2)

***

• Lawyers at the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, which represented Allen, say that it's a rare victory for a tenant in a post-foreclosure case and that the verdict has caught the interest of legal services groups nationwide.

• "The impact of this case is that the banks now know that if they engage in extrajudicial practices to gain possession of a foreclosed property it can cost them dearly," said Verner Moore, a lawyer and clinical instructor at the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau.

For more, see Vindication after eviction ordeal (Jury backs tenant in foreclosure dispute).

Go here for more on the law students at the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau urging tenants in foreclosed homes to fight back against careless/reckless mortgage companies seeking illegal evictions.

(1) The story states that, after experiencing a loss of heat and water to the premises, Allen turned to WilmerHale Legal Services Center in Jamaica Plain - one of two legal services programs run by Harvard. A law student reportedly fired off a letter to the Bank of New York, saying that Allen lived there and urging the bank to get the heat and water turned back on. Allen alleges that the bank instead changed the locks and sent police after him.

(2) Reportedly, the case is not over. A hearing is a set for Jan. 30, when Allen's lawyers will ask a judge to double or triple the award because, they contend, the bank willfully and knowingly failed to act responsibly as a landlord. They will also seek attorneys' fees.

Failure To File Proper Paperwork A Stumbling Block For Plaintiffs In Credit Card Suits As Well As Mortgage Foreclosures

In Erie, Pennsylvania, the Erie Times News recently ran a story on how some individual consumers are fighting back against large finance companies in debt lawsuits:

• [A] recent ruling in Erie County Court, as well as rulings in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Erie and in Pittsburgh, show how judges are forcing credit-card companies, banks and mortgage companies to play by the rules, even as those corporations are desperate to collect on debts in these desperate times.

• The fine print -- all those regulations enumerated in tiny words in credit-card contracts and mortgages -- apply not only to you, the consumer. The banks and credit-card companies must follow them too. And, with the help of vigilant judges, "they are starting to," said Erie lawyer Lori R. Miller.

***

• Erie County Judge Shad Connelly, citing Pennsylvania law, agreed with Miller and threw out a suit over a claimed debt of $21,305, including more than $3,000 in interest, on a Bank One credit card. Connelly said the plaintiff, a debt-collection company called Unifund CCR Partners, failed to file the proper paperwork(1) and filed an amended version of its suit too late.(2)

For more, including how two bankruptcy judges in Erie and Pittsburgh are holding lenders feet to the fire in home foreclosure actions, see In some area debt cases, small print has yielded big help.

(1) Among the documents lacking, Connelly said, were a complete list of the dates and merchants for the disputed charges; the contract or credit agreement that Anderson would have received with the disputed credit card; and the appropriate documentation showing how Unifund purchased Anderson's claimed debt from another company, First USA Platinum.

(2) Reportedly, Judge Connelly gave Unifund a chance to file a corrected suit, though attorney Anderson could argue that any new civil action violates the four-year statute of limitations in her case.

Sloppy Lender/Servicer Leaves Judge Fuming, Homeowners Frustrated

A recent story in The New York Times describes how Wells Fargo left one federal bankruptcy judge fuming regarding a dispute the lender had with a homeowner couple over whether they had missed some of their required payments on their home loan. Wells Fargo claimed that the couple missed some payments but that, if they could present “valid, accurate and true copies” of the front and back of the checks they sent in, they would receive the proper credit.

What ultimately had the judge fuming was that, several months later, evidence came out that strongly suggested that the borrowers' purportedly missing payments to Wells Fargo were, in fact, received and processed electronically. That meant that the lender never returned the checks to the borrowers' bank, thereby making it impossible for the couple to provide the proof of payment that Wells Fargo had demanded in the first place. An excerpt from the story:

• [S]idney B. Brooks, the judge overseeing the case, was clearly dismayed by the bank’s performance. In his opinion, he fumed that Wells Fargo had asked the borrowers for canceled checks as proof of payment, even though such checks were often not available.

• Wells Fargo’s request for canceled checks was especially troubling, the judge said, given that the bank was a proponent of the 2003 law that allowed banks to stop returning canceled checks to customers.

• The only institution that could have the original checks is Wells Fargo, he concluded. “The payments have, evidently, been lost in a black hole of the creditor’s organization or through accounting mismanagement,” the judge wrote. “This is a major lender/mortgage loan servicer where the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing — the collection department does not know what the check processing and accounting departments are doing.”

• Because this is not the first time the judge has encountered problems in Wells Fargo’s operations, he is considering sanctions on the bank. “This dispute might portend a widespread abuse of collection practices or creditor overreaching,” he wrote, “demanding of debtors what it, the creditor itself, is unable to provide: accurate and reliable record keeping and billing practices.”(1)

Not surprisingly, Wells Fargo reportedly disgreed with the judge's conclusions.

For the story, see A Mortgage Paper Trail Often Leads to Nowhere.

For the judge's written decision, see Wells Fargo v. Burrier.

(1) According to the story, the attorney for the homeowners says that this kind of dispute is becoming more common in her practice and that borrowers wind up losing too often. “A lot of times clients don’t keep canceled checks or maybe their bank account was closed and they can’t go and get the proof,” she said. “The bank gets that extra money for as long as the debtor can keep it up and when they can’t they are pushed out of their homes.” SloppyForeclosuresAlpha

Loan Modification Firms Beginning To Find Themselves In The Crosshairs Of Various Groups

The Washington Post reports:

• A growing industry has emerged to take advantage of the unprecedented wave of foreclosures, charging distressed homeowners for help negotiating better loan terms -- a service provided for free or for a nominal fee by many nonprofits.

• Such companies charge $500 to $2,500 or more and are drawing the ire of consumer advocates, regulators and lenders, who say many are just the latest version of foreclosure rescue scams and can make it more difficult for homeowners to get help.

For more see Firms Charge Thousands To Modify Mortgages (Nonprofits Offer Service For Free, Advocates Say).

Foreclosing Lender Can't Prove Ownership Of The Note? So What's The Big Deal???

The following excerpt out of a recent article on MSNBC.com addresses the importance of establishing the ownership of a promissory note in foreclosure (or, for that matter, not in foreclosure):

• [M]aking an issue out of the actual ownership of the securitized title might strike some as a shameless stalling tactic aimed at abetting a debtor who, after all, owes the money. But [Florida attorney April] Charney said that if such basic legalities aren’t adhered to, a homeowner could pay his or her way out of a foreclosure jam only to wind up in another when a new plaintiff emerges claiming to own the debt. She described cases in which homeowners have been sued for foreclosure by two different trusts, each claiming they owned their house, and cases where trusts have been sent documents on the same case by two different servicers.(1)

***

• Bert Ely, a longtime analyst of the financial services industry and a scholar at the conservative Cato Institute who was among the first to predict the S&L scandal of the 1980s, said lenders may detest tactics like the ones Charney employs, but “this is well-established in bankruptcy practice, that you have to properly perfect the security interest, and if you haven’t, you’re screwed. … Debtors’ lawyers immediately start looking for flaws in how the debt is protected. Creditor attorneys always worry about this.”

• “It kind of boggles my mind that this is even an issue” in the nation’s current mortgage mess, he said. “I don’t understand how lawyers let this happen in the first place.” Mortgage-lending and servicing is “a matter of dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s. … That’s what puts the discipline in the process.”

For the story, see 'Angel' of foreclosure defense bedevils lenders (Florida attorney trains hundreds of others to help troubled borrowers). (for the entire story on one web page, try here).

(1) For an account describing this (apparently growing) phenomenon, see The Wall Street Journal Law Blog: Foreclosure Mess: Two Different Plaintiffs Claim to Own Same Mortgage. According to the story, Charney points out that, because of the way mortgages have been securitized, it’s often unclear who actually owns the debt, and further, found that in many cases, the originating lenders only pledged these loans and didn’t actually transfer ownership of them to the trusts that are supposed to hold them and issue the securities. KappaMtgDocsMissing

Judges, Homeowner Attorneys Begin To Wonder How To Do A Loan Modification When Lender Can't Prove Ownership Of Promissory Note?

The New York Times reports:

• WITH home prices in free fall and mortgage delinquencies mounting, pressure to modify troubled loans is ratcheting up. But lawyers who represent candidates for modifications say the programs are hobbled by the complexity of securitization pools that hold the loans, as well as uncertainty about who actually owns the notes underlying the mortgages.(1)

***

• How can a loan be modified, these lawyers ask, if the lender cannot prove that it actually owns the note? More and more judges are asking the same thing about lenders trying to foreclose on borrowers.

For more, see A Mortgage Paper Trail Often Leads to Nowhere.

For posts that reference the failure of mortgage lenders and their attorneys to prove ownership of the promissory note when starting foreclosure actions, Go Here, Go Here, Go Here, Go Here, and Go Here.

(1) As the article points out, problems often emerge because these notes — which are written promises to repay the full amount of a mortgage — weren’t physically handled, legally transferred, or accounted for properly when they were bundled by Wall Street into pools or were subsequently transferred to other holders. Many of the notes are now missing. KappaMtgDocsMissing SloppyForeclosuresAlpha

Judge Tells Convicted Foreclosure Rescue Scammer To "Take A Hike" In Response To Request For Relief From Sentence

In Newark, Ohio, the Newark Advocate reports:

• A man convicted of preying on homeowners facing foreclosure was in prison for slightly more than two weeks before his first chance at early release presented itself. Common Pleas Judge Thomas Marcelain [last week] denied Harry Blausey an opportunity for placement in a state program that could have allowed him to move first to a halfway house or immediately be released on parole, [...].

• Blausey was convicted Nov. 3 of nine counts of grand theft, a fourth-degree felony; 13 counts of securing writings by deception,(1) a fourth-degree felony; and four counts of theft, a fifth-degree felony.(2)

Blausey was sentenced to four and half years in prison.

For more, see Blausey denied entry into early-release program.

Go here for other posts on foreclosure rescue operator Harry Blausey.

(1) Sec. 2913.43(A), Ohio Rev. Code: "No person, by deception, shall cause another to execute any writing that disposes of or encumbers property, or by which a pecuniary obligation is incurred."

(2) According to the story, the state successfully argued Blausey deceived 13 couples and individuals into signing over deeds to their homes on the premise that he would negotiate with their mortgage companies to avoid defaulting on their home debts.

"Foreclosure Chaser" Charged In Alleged Scam To Screw Lenders Financing His Buys; Accused Of "Playing The Gap" Leaving Title Insurers Holding The Bag

In Denver, Colorado, The Denver Post reports:

• A man described by the Denver grand jury as a "foreclosure chaser" has been charged with multiple counts of theft and forgery for allegedly stealing money from various financial institutions in the Denver area. Indicted was Jay Donovan Jost, 63, who owned a series of companies, including Broomfield Lending LLC; MI-T Investments LLC; and Y-ZER Investments LLC.

• According to the indictment, Jost is a "foreclosure chaser," who — through his various companies — obtains title to properties in foreclosure by establishing a redemption position. This is usually done by buying out a debt against the property.

***

• The grand jury alleged that beginning in April 2005, Jost — using his companies — devised a scheme in which he defrauded those who were lending him the money to redeem the properties. Unknown to the lenders, said the grand jury, Jost had often already encumbered the properties. As a result, the deeds of trust offered for security often left the lender in an inferior position to another title holder.

• In many of these cases, said the indictment, Jost was "playing the gap" — the time period between when legal documents from a closing on the property are presented to a county recorder and when the county actually records them. The gap in Colorado can be from five days to two weeks. During this gap period, title companies are unable to discover whether someone else holds title to a particular property.

• Jost would use this "gap" to take out a mortgage from a second lender on a property that he, through one of his corporations, had recently purchased, the grand jury said. In some instances, Jost signed affidavits swearing the properties were unencumbered when, in fact, they were, said the indictment. As a result, the lenders were left without repayment on their loans to Jost.

• Not only were the lenders deceived, said the grand jury, but so were the title companies involved in the closings with the lenders and Jost. The title companies guaranteed the entity making the loan that the properties were unencumbered. As a result of Jost's alleged trickery by playing the gap, said the grand jury, they were unable to discover that Jost had encumbered the properties. The title companies were then obligated to pay the lenders for the money lost as a result, said the indictment.

For the story, see Denver grand jury indicts 'foreclosure chaser.'

"Baby Mama" Accuses Ex-NBAer Of Forging Signature On Releases Of Lien For Child Support, Then Draining Equity From The Unencumbered Properties w/ Refi

In Mobile, Alabama, the Press Register reports on a civil lawsuit involving a former pro athlete and one of, what has been alleged to be a slew of, his babies mamas:

• Former pro basketball player Jason Caffey has been hit with a lawsuit accusing him of using forged signatures on legal documents to transfer property.(1) [...] Caffey put up the properties as part of a negotiated settlement in a child-support case.

• The plaintiff, Nicole Carter, is one of at least eight women with whom Caffey has had children, according to court records.

***

• Carter's lawsuit accuses Caffey of forging her signature on documents filed in Mobile County Probate Court on Feb. 28, 2007, and May 31, 2007, canceling liens on the properties. "Jason admitted in a newspaper interview that he signed it but that my client authorized it. She did not," said Carter's lawyer, Steven L. Terry.

• After canceling the liens, according to the lawsuit, Caffey transferred the properties to Marita Hansberry, who then refinanced them and sucked out the equity.

For more, see Caffey, former NBA player, accused of forgery (for the entire story on one page, try here).

Go here, Go here, go here, go here, and go here for other posts related to deed or refinancing scams by forgery, swindle, etc.

(1) Reportedly, the lawsuit also names the woman to whom rental properties were transferred, as well as the notary public who witnessed the transaction and the title company that handled the refinancing of the properties. KappaDeedTheft