Elderly, Penniless Mom Tells Judge To Jail Son For Home Equity Ripoff; Man Accused Of Abusing POA To Pocket Proceeds Of Reverse Mortgage On Residence

In Sarasota, Florida, the Sarasota Herald Tribune reports:

• An 82-year-old woman suffering from the mental and physical fallout of a stroke told a judge Thursday that her son should go to prison for stealing from her. About an hour later, her 61-year-old son was handcuffed, fingerprinted and sent away for two years.

• "Never in my life would I dream I would be in a position where my firstborn son hurt me," Barbara White said in a letter read aloud in court. "I am penniless and have had foreclosure suits filed against me."

• White's letter talked about the three years of suffering she has endured after finding out her son, Michael Garrett, took more than $80,000 from her. [...] A jury had convicted Garrett of using his power of attorney to give her a reverse mortgage on her home, then spend almost all the money on himself in 30 days.

For more, see Mother tells judge to imprison son (Michael Garrett was given a two-year prison sentence for stealing $80,000 from his mother).

Go here, Go here, go here, go here, and go here for other posts related to deed or refinancing scams by forgery, swindle, etc.

Go here, here, here, here, here, and here for other posts on elder financial abuse. KappaDeedTheft FinancialAbuseOfElderlyAlpha

Memphis Loan Modification / Foreclosure Rescue Firm Agrees To Temporary Injunction With Tennessee AG; Will Stop Clipping Homeowners For Upfront Fees

In Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Commercial Appeal reports:

• Memphis mortgage rescue company Patrick & Patrick Loss Mitigation Services has agreed to stop what the Tennessee Attorney General charged in a Nov. 18 lawsuit (go here for the Tennessee AG's Nov. 18 press release; here for the Tennessee AG's lawsuit; and here for Motion for Temporary Injunction & Asset Freeze) were illegal activities.

• According to the temporary injunction agreed to Tuesday by the firm and the attorney general, the firm may not engage in unfair or deceptive business practices, practice law, offer credit services without registering a bond with the state and must tell consumers in writing what services the firm and its people have provided before getting paid.

For more, see Memphis mortgage rescue company agrees to stop 'illegal practices.'

For Tennessee Attorney General Bob Cooper's January 13, 2009 press release, see: Tennessee Foreclosure Rescue Company Enters Agreed Order to Halt Alleged Unlawful Activities.

The Sloppiness Continues For Attorneys Representing Foreclosing Lenders; "They Are Totally Disorganized!" Says Florida's 12th Judicial Circuit Chief

In Sarasota, Florida, the Sarasota Herald Tribune reports:

• [T]he foreclosure glut is so bad that the law firms that specialize in handling the court cases in bulk for lenders are now too busy. They even let many foreclosure cases stall and remain inactive for months or years, if resident homeowners put up any sort of legal fight.

• [Florida's 12th Judicial Circuit Chief Judge Lee] Haworth says those law firms are apparently even failing to read [his] official written notifications [...]. Notices about local courtroom rules changes, like Haworth's requirement that there be a mediation meeting with a homeowner before a foreclosure can proceed, seem to go unread.

• "They are totally disorganized," Haworth said. They seek court hearing dates that the new rules say they are not entitled to, and seem clueless about it all.

For the story, see Troubled mortgages burdening the courts.

For Chief Judge Haworth's official notifications and links to the forms now required to be filed by attorneys representing foreclosing lenders within Florida's 12th Judicial Circuit (Sarasota, Manatee, and Desoto Counties), see:

• Chief Judge's Letter To Attorneys Summarizing New Foreclosure Procedures And Administrative Orders,
• Administrative Order Establishing Circuit-Wide Homestead Foreclosure Conciliation Program,
• 12th Judicial Circuit's Foreclosure Forms Section (links to required forms and procedures for 12th Circuit foreclosure actions),
• Go here for the 12th Judicial Court's website.

Maryland Victim Of "Money Store" Equity Stripping Scam Loses Battle Against Lender Seeking Mortgage Foreclosure

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals ruled last week against a homeowner fighting to save her home from foreclosure where her financial predicament was exacerbated by seeking help from a now-defunct foreclosure rescue operator.(1)

The court decision addressed the application of Maryland's Protection of Homeowners in Foreclosure Act (PHIFA), and how it applied as against a foreclosing lender.(2) The court ruled that PHIFA did not void the foreclosure rescue transactions, but rather made them voidable as to persons with notice. The mortgagee, the assignee of the lender who provided the financing in the foreclosure rescue, equity stripping scam, was held to be a bona fide purchaser/lender, and accordingly, was not subject to the homeowner's right of rescission.

In seeking to disqualify the foreclosing lender as a bona fide purchaser/lender without notice, the homeowner contended that the foreclosing lender had notice of the alleged fraudulent scam by reason of the fact that the foreclosure rescue operator, the closing agent, and/or the straw buyer were agents of the lender and their knowledge was imputed to it.

Alternatively, the homeowner contended that the foreclosing lender was on notice of sufficient facts to impose a duty to make appropriate inquiries, and failed to do so, thereby disqualifying it as a bona fide purchaser/lender and preventing it from foreclosing.

The court rejected both contentions.

For the court decision, see Julian v. Buonassissi, No. 2740, Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2009 Md. App. LEXIS 2 (January 5, 2009).

(1) The alleged scam was one involving the notorious Metropolitan Money Store, of Lanham, Maryland.
(2) Maryland Code (2005, Supp. 2006), § 7-301, et. seq. of the Real Property Article.

NJ Closing Lawyer Cops Plea To Pocketing $4M In Escrow Cash; Blows Money Intended For Existing Lien Holders On AC Slots; Title Insurers Foot The Bill

From the Office of the New Jersey Attorney General:

• Attorney General Anne Milgram and Criminal Justice Director Deborah L. Gramiccioni announced that a Lyndhurst lawyer pleaded guilty [last week] to stealing approximately $4 million entrusted to him for real estate closings, which he used to gamble in Atlantic City.(1)

***

• [Michael P.] Rumore was hired as an attorney and settlement agent for real estate purchasers. Between April 16, 2007 and August 13, 2008, he received approximately $4 million into his attorney trust account from various mortgage companies. He had a duty to disburse the funds for closings and use them to pay balances on existing mortgages and other associated costs and fees.

• In pleading guilty, Rumore admitted that he instead transferred the funds into his personal and business accounts and used them to gamble at casinos in Atlantic City, primarily on slot machines.

For the NJ AG press release, see Lyndhurst Lawyer Pleads Guilty to Stealing $4 Million in Funds for Real Estate Closings Which He Gambled in Atlantic City.

Go here, Go here, Go here, and Go here for other stories of trust account / escrow account theft of funds.

(1) According to the NJ AG press release, the plea agreement provides that the state will recommend that attorney Michael P. Rumore be sentenced to 15 years in state prison, and must sign a consent judgment to pay full restitution to the victims, which are various title insurance companies. Rumore, 50, pleaded guilty to first-degree money laundering and second-degree theft by failure to make required disposition of property received. EscrowRipOffAlpha

NYC Attorney Disbarred For Stealing From Clients Refuses To Stop Practicing Law; Arrested Last Week For 3rd Time Since Losing License

In New York City, the New York Post reports:

• Practice doesn't necessarily make perfect. An elderly Manhattan lawyer, banished from the legal profession for stealing from clients, could spend his golden years in prison - because he refuses to stay out of the city's courthouses.

• At an age when most career attorneys have taken to the golf course, all 81- year-old Bertram Brown wants to do is work, something he is now alleged to have done three times under an alias since his disbarment.

***

• Brown, a Columbia Law grad and an attorney for nearly a half-century, surrendered to Brooklyn prosecutors last week for allegedly using a phony name to represent a client in a housing-court case.

• He's been without a license since April 2006, when he was disbarred for stealing $54,000 from a Queens man [William Ryan] who had hired him to stop the foreclosure on his Ozone Park home.

***

• Brown was also charged with stealing more than $20,000 from one of Ryan's neighbors, whom he represented in the sale of her Ozone Park home, authorities said.

For more, see COURT IN OB-SESSION (Crooked Attn'y Refuses To Stop Practicing).

Nigerian Scam Artist Swipes & Sells Deed To Cape Coral Lot; Leaves Listing Agent With Egg On Face, Title Insurer Holding The Bag

In Cape Coral, Florida, the News Press reports:

• Roberta Kunda thought she was buying a vacant lot in Cape Coral. Instead, $18,000 of her money went to a computer-savvy scam artist — possibly in Nigeria. Because she had title insurance, Kunda will probably get back her money from the 2007 purchase, but the incident highlights cracks in the real estate market and the risk from international scammers who are growing more sophisticated.

***

• Kunda went through a reputable RE/MAX realtor, paid for a title search and filed all the proper paperwork. But somehow, the real estate agent, title company and an underwriter on the title insurance all missed the fact that the seller was a scam artist who never owned the property [...]. Whoever posed as the seller on Kunda's property had the Deed Warranty notarized in Lagos, Nigeria. That address, [a manager at a local title agency] said, should have triggered a red flag. It did not.

For more, see Internet scammer sells Cape Coral residential lot for $18,000. KappaDeedTheft

One More Arrested, Two Others Sought In San Diego-Area Alleged Land Patent, Foreclosure Rescue Scam; 17 Cheated Out Of $100K+, Say Prosecutors

In San Diego, California, the San Diego Union Tribune reports:

• Prosecutors are asking for the public's help in finding two people suspected of scamming homeowners in a foreclosure fraud scheme, officials announced Friday. Julita Whittingham and Edgardo Orcino are part of a group of people suspected of defrauding San Diego County homeowners out of more than $100,000 in 2007, prosecutors said.

***

• A third suspect, Jessica Refuerzo, 55, of Spring Valley, was found and taken into custody Friday, officials said. Prosecutors said the trio falsely promised to help homeowners who had defaulted on mortgage payments or who feared they would soon default by holding seminars in which they pitched their scheme.(1)

For more, see Authorities Seek 2 In Alleged Land Patent Scam.

(1) Two other suspects in the case are in custody. Larry Smith, 60, has pleaded not guilty to felony charges of grand theft, conspiracy to commit grand theft and engaging in deceitful practices while acting as a mortgage foreclosure consultant. Prosecutors said Smith and the others sold “land patents” to homeowners facing foreclosure and told them that the patents would make them a sovereign nation that would be protected from the banks. At least 17 people fell for the scheme, prosecutors said, and lost tens of thousands of dollars.

Mortgage Servicers Feeling The Pain As Mounting Mortgage Delinquencies Drain Cash Reserves

Bloomberg News reports:

• Bank of America Corp., GMAC LLC, and WL Ross & Co. are among mortgage servicers that have endured billions of dollars in unexpected costs and added thousands of workers to handle rising foreclosures, denting a business once viewed as a safe haven from the housing market’s collapse.

***

• Servicers agree to advance cash to investors when borrowers are delinquent and get repaid when the loans are brought current or through foreclosure sales. [...] When late payments mount, servicers have to draw on their own reserves or credit lines until they conclude the loan won’t be repaid.

For more, see Mortgage Servicing Loses Luster as Bad Loans Mount.

IRS To Ease Up On Squeezing Financially Stressed Taxpayers Owing Back Taxes

The Sacramento Bee reports:

• Can't pay your federal taxes? The IRS wants to help. Acknowledging the "difficult economic times," officials said Tuesday they're relaxing some rules to help financially stressed taxpayers dealing with job losses and other economic uncertainty.

Among the measures announced Tuesday:

• IRS employees now have "greater authority to suspend collection actions in cases where taxpayers simply cannot pay," said [IRS commissioner Doug] Shulman.

• Taxpayers may be allowed to skip a payment or obtain a reduced monthly payment, without automatically suspending their current installment agreement for paying back taxes. Previously, if a payment was missed or late, those agreements would be voided, with the full amount due.

• Given the steep drop in home values, the IRS has set up a unit to handle cases where a home's value has stymied efforts to reach an "offer in compromise."(1) A so-called OIC agreement allows a taxpayer to settle a tax debt for less than what's owed. "Anytime home equity is a roadblock to an OIC, we're going to take a second look," Shulman said. Also, taxpayers who are already in an OIC but cannot make their payments for hardship reasons will be offered options to avoid default.

• Taxpayers whose wages or bank accounts are being garnished for delinquent back taxes can request a hardship release. The IRS says it will work with taxpayers to speed up so-called "levy releases."(2)

For more, see IRS relaxes some rules for those in financial bind.

Go here for more on:

• IRS Offer-In-Compromise - see IRS Form 656 & Instructions (44 pages - 3.3 MB);
• IRS Payment Plans, Installment Agreements - see IRS Form 9465),
• The IRS Collection Process - IRS Publication 594 .

(1) An offer in compromise (OIC) is an agreement between a taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service that settles the taxpayer’s tax liabilities for less than the full amount owed. For an IRS advisory warning taxpayers to beware of promoters’ claims that tax debts can be settled for “pennies on the dollar,” see IR-2004-17: Check Carefully Before Applying for Offers in Compromise.

(2) A levy is a legal seizure of your property to satisfy a tax debt. Levies are different from liens. A lien is a claim used as security for the tax debt, while a levy actually takes the property to satisfy the tax debt. Go here for more on IRS tax levies.

Cramdowns & Lien Stripping Of Home Mortgages Under Existing Bankruptcy Law

Buried at the end of a recent story in The Wall Street Journal contains an excerpt referencing how the existing bankruptcy rules can be used when stripping second mortgages from "underwater" real estate(1) (either owner-occupied or investment properties), and how the current bankruptcy cramdown rules (unless changes currently under consideration are enacted) can only be used to modify (ie. cramdown) existing first mortgages on investment properties and not those that are owner-occupied:

• Samuel Schwartz, a Las Vegas bankruptcy lawyer, has a client who is facing foreclosure on her primary residence even though she has been able to modify the loans on her two investment houses. Under the current bankruptcy rules, she was able to "strip away" the second mortgage on one of the investment homes and she "crammed down," or reduced, the principal balances on the first mortgages for both rentals -- reducing her combined loan balances to a total of $355,000 from $590,000.

• She was also able to strip away the second mortgage on her primary residence but couldn't modify the first mortgage. That mortgage, Mr. Schwartz said, is more than $100,000 above the current value of the property. Thus, she still may lose her own home. Under the [proposed] new law, her first mortgage on her home also could be modified.

For the story, see Power to Modify Mortgages Sits Well With Judges.

(1) Property that is worth less than the amount owed on the existing mortgage(s) encumbering the real estate.

Major Lender, Top Senate Democrats Reach Understanding On Mortgage Cramdown Provisions Allowing Bankruptcy Judges To Modify Troubled Home Loans

The Wall Street Journal reports:

• A Senate bill aimed at giving strapped homeowners more leverage in renegotiating their mortgages cleared a hurdle Thursday when Citigroup Inc. dropped its opposition. The legislation, which is being advanced by top Senate Democrats, would let judges set new repayment terms for mortgage holders in bankruptcy court.

***

• The proposal from Sen. Dick Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, to allow so-called mortgage "cramdowns," would apply only to homeowners who have filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection.

***

• The Democrats' proposal allows judges to approve plans that make major reductions in home-loan debts, after homeowners certify that they have attempted to contact their lenders about a mortgage reduction before bankruptcy proceedings begin. [...] The cramdown bill would apply to all mortgage loans, including subprime loans, written any time prior to the bill's date of enactment.

• In a concession to lenders, a mortgage debt could be forgiven entirely only if the lender was found committed a major violation of the Truth in Lending Act. Under the bill's original language, the entire mortgage debt could be wiped away based on a violation of any number of state and federal consumer lending laws.

For more, see Plan to Cut Foreclosure Rate Clears Key Hurdle.

See also:

• BusinessWeek: Does Citigroup Stand Alone? Industry Balks at Bankruptcy Bill,
• New York Times: Citi Reaches Deal With Lawmakers on Home Loans.

$100M Class Action Suit Filed Against L.I.-Based Loan Modification Company; Described As More Of A Sales Operation Than Professional Services Firm

In downstate New York, Crain's New York Business recently ran a story about American Modification Agency (AMA), a Long Island-based loan modification firm that, allegedly, has been the target of numerous complaints from homeowners claiming the company clipped them for thousands in upfront fees in exchange for failed promises of adjustments to the terms of their home loans to make their house payments affordable.

As part of the arrangement, the firm is accused of instructing the homeowners to cease making payments to, and ignore all communication from, their lender. White Plains, NY attorney Jeffrey Greene reportedly filed a $100 million class-action suit(1) against AMA last month and descibed the deal as, “It's like taking somebody's money and telling them to jump off a bridge.”

• [C]ourt papers and interviews with customers and former employees reveal a company that pulled out all the stops to bring customers in, but did little or nothing for them once it had their money. Phone calls went unanswered; untrained agents dissatisfied with paltry commissions resigned, leaving customers in the lurch; and homeowners received foreclosure notices despite guarantees that their homes would be saved.

• AMA claims to be the largest of a growing collection of mortgage modification firms that have sprouted up nationwide in the past two years as homeowners have battled to keep up with unaffordable subprime loans. The burgeoning industry has caught the eye of the FBI's New York office and the state attorney general's office, which are reviewing complaints.

• Former sales agents say working for AMA was a nightmare. They received no training or salary and relied on commissions of 15% to 25%. Many of the clients they brought in never had their loans modified by the firm's processors, with whom they were not allowed to speak. “We've had clients in for well over 150 days that aren't done,” says an agent who was hired off a Craigslist ad and worked at AMA for six months.

***

• Former employees say the company grew too fast, too soon and describe a frenetic, almost circus-like atmosphere in the office. They recall President Sal Pane riding around the office on a Segway scooter drinking Red Bull and exhorting agents to bring in customers.

• “Each time we'd turn in a file, we'd go out on the floor and hit a gigantic brass gong hanging from the ceiling,” says one former employee. “Everybody cheered one another, "yeah, yeah, yeah.'"

For the story, see No helping hand (Struggling families sue mortgage fixer AMA; paid but got nothing in return).

(1) Presumably, any evidence of possible wrongdoing coming out of this civil suit will come in handy for federal and state prosecutors (both in New York and in other states in which AMA operates) in deciding whether to bring their own cases (either civil or criminal) against the firm.

FTC, Central Florida Upfront Fee Foreclosure Rescue Operator Resolve Charges Of Screwing Financially Strapped Homeowners

The Federal Trade Commission announced:

• A mortgage foreclosure rescue service that claimed that, for a $1,200 fee, they would stop foreclosure and save consumers’ homes, has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it violated federal law. Many consumers who paid the company ultimately lost their homes to foreclosure, and others avoided foreclosure only through their own efforts.

***

• The settlement imposes a judgment of $1,178,920, all but $8,320.84 of which is suspended based on the defendants’ inability to pay. The full judgment will be imposed if they are found to have misrepresented their financial condition. The settlement also contains record-keeping provisions to allow the FTC to monitor compliance with the order.

• The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the stipulated final order regarding Florida-based Mortgage Foreclosure Solutions, Inc., Debra Behrens, and Michael Siani, was 4-0.

For more, see:

• FTC Press Release: Mortgage Foreclosure "Rescue" Operators Settle with FTC,
• Stipulated Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction,
• Original FTC lawsuit: Federal Trade Commission v. Mortgage Foreclosure Solutions, Inc., et al. loan modification

Two Loan Modification Firms Resove Issues With Colorado AG; Agree To Refund $30K To Homeowners, Pay $10K In Investigative Costs

In Denver, Colorado, Rocky Mountain News reports:

• Two companies collecting money to help homeowners avoid foreclosure have reached agreements with Colorado Attorney General John Suthers, [...].

• Suthers announced Sunday that Castle Rock-based Hawk Financial Services agreed to pay $26,500 in fees unlawfully collected from 31 customers before performing any service. Suthers also collected $10,000 in penalties, costs and attorneys' fees. Infinity Funding Group of Bohemia, N.Y., agreed to refund a $3,500 payment collected up front from one customer.

Source: Attorney General reaches settlement with mortgage companies.

Loan Modification Firm Accused Of Illegally Charging Minnesota Couple Upfront Fees To Avoid Foreclosure

In St. Paul, Minnesota, WCCO-TV Channel 4 reports on another casualty involving loan modification firms illegally charging homeowners facing foreclosure upfront fees to avoid foreclosure.

• The [homeowners] paid almost $2,000 to National Foreclosure Counseling Services three months ago. They haven't heard anything from them for weeks. Now, their home will go up for auction first thing Tuesday morning.

***

• Minnesota's Attorney General Lori Swanson has sued 10 companies in the last year for the very same thing. It's illegal in Minnesota for foreclosure consultants to charge anything until after they do something.

For more, see Mortgage Help Scam Now Costing Couple Their Home.

San Diego Media Outlet Looks Into Area Loan Modification Firm

In San Diego, California, XETV-TV Channel 6 recently reported on an area loan modification firm that charges homeowners an upfront fee of $2,995. Channel 6 was reportedly able to obtain a script used by the firm's telemarketers to reel in financially strapped homeowners.

For the story, see They Promise a Safe House But Do They Deliver? (read text) (watch video).

Go here for the firm's telemarketing script.

Connecticut AG Urges Passage Of New Law To Target Loan Modification, Debt Reduction Firms

From the Connecticut Attorney General's Office:

• Attorney General Richard Blumenthal [Tuesday] proposed legislation to fight predatory debt reducers that offer mortgage and debt rescue services that may actually cost consumers their homes. [...] Debt reducers are unregulated and often claim to offer services to rescue homeowners from foreclosure or severe debt.

• In some cases, debt reducers deceive consumers into relinquishing their homes, turning homeowners into tenants. In other cases, consumers pay expensive advance fees to debt reducers that fail to provide promised relief. Often, consumers report that oral promises fail to translate into consumer contracts.

• Blumenthal's proposal -- An Act Concerning Foreclosure Rescue and Debt Reducers -- would compel debt reducers to provide advance disclosures that clearly and conspicuously explain their services, and prohibit advance fees.

For more of the Connecticut AG press release, see Attorney General Investigates And Seeks To Stop Predatory Debt Reducers.

See also, The Connecticut Post: Blumenthal: Beware of debt-reduction companies.

Bank Screw-Up Throws Tennessee Congresswoman's Home Into Foreclosure; No Word Yet On Impending Blizzard Of Unscrupulous Loan Modification Offers

In Brentwood, Tennessee, The Associated Press reports:

• A bank's mistake caused a Tennessee congresswoman's home to enter foreclosure. Bank officials say Republican U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn's home was placed into foreclosure proceedings because of a processing error.

• GreenBank spokesman Bill Adams said in a letter dated Thursday that Blackburn's husband had authorized several electronic mortgage payments for the suburban Nashville home, but that the bank failed to send the money to Countrywide Financial. Adams says the Greeneville-based bank is working with Countrywide to resolve the issue.

No word on whether Rep. Blackburn has begun finding her mailbox stuffed with loan modification solicitations.

Source: Bank: error led to Blackburn's home foreclosure.

FTC, 3 Loan Orignators Settle Charges Of TILA & Reg Z Violations; Deceptively Advertising "Teaser" Rates

The Federal Trade Commission announced:

• Three mortgage loan advertisers that allegedly deceptively touted low monthly payments and low rates without fully disclosing loan terms have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that their ads violated federal law.(1)

• According to the FTC, the ads represented that people could receive mortgage loans at the terms prominently stated in the ads. However, in violation of the FTC Act, the ads allegedly failed to disclose, or failed to disclose adequately, that the advertised low monthly payment amounts and low rates apply only for a limited time, after which they will increase, and that the advertised payment amounts and rates did not include the interest owed each month, with the interest added to the total loan balance.

For more, see Three Home Loan Advertisers Settle FTC Charges; Failed to Disclose Key Loan Terms in Ads.

(1) For links to the relevant court documents in the three cases (ie. consent orders, original FTC complaints, etc.), see:

• American Nationwide Mortgage Co.;
• Michael Gendrolis, doing business as Good Life Funding; and
• Shiva Venture Group, Inc., doing business as Innova Financial Group.

NY AG Settles With Two Mortgage Brokerages, Files Suit Against Another For Alleged Race-Based, Discriminatory Lending Practices

From the Office of the New York Atttorney General:

• Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo [Monday] announced results of a landmark investigation with the New York State Department of Banking into discriminatory practices in the mortgage brokerage industry.

• In the first law enforcement action of its kind in New York State, two mortgage brokerage companies – HCI Mortgage and Consumer One Mortgage – will collectively pay $665,000 in restitution to approximately 455 Black and Latino borrowers who were illegally charged higher fees than similarly-situated White borrowers. The companies collectively operate more than 20 branches throughout New York State.

• The Attorney General also filed a lawsuit in federal district court against another mortgage brokerage company – U.S. Capital Funding, LLC – that engaged in similar discriminatory practices.(1)

Go here for the NY AG press release: Attorney General Cuomo Announces Groundbreaking Agreement With Major Mortgage Brokers Who Discriminated Against Minority Customers (HCI and Consumer One to Pay Over $650,000 in Restitution After Illegally Charging Black and Latino Customers Higher Brokerage Fees; Cuomo Sues U.S. Capital Funding for Similar Discriminatory Practices).

Go here, Go here, and Go here for other posts on alleged race bias in real estate transactions.

(1) According to the NY AG press release, unlike HCI and Consumer One, U.S. Capital Funding failed to agree to provide appropriate relief to victims. Consequently, the Attorney General filed a lawsuit seeking restitution for over 100 minority borrowers and a court order requiring the company to cease its discriminatory practices. DiscriminationPredatoryLendingAlpha

City Of Memphis Joins Shelby County; Gives Go-Ahead For Discrimination Suit Targeting Major Home Lenders

In Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Commercial Appeal reports:

• City Council members on Tuesday approved a resolution authorizing the city to file suit against national lenders who they say created a foreclosure crisis in Memphis and Shelby County that disproportionately affected African-Americans.

• The resolution alleges lenders engaged in "deceptive" and "discriminatory" lending practices targeted at the black community and "other select groups" that caused "substantial" and "irreparable" harm to neighborhoods and the governments.

• The Shelby County Commission recently approved a similar resolution (see Shelby commissioners authorize lawsuits against mortgage lenders), claiming the foreclosure epidemic has devastated neighborhoods, slashed property values, eroded the tax base and drained local government coffers because of a host of direct and indirect costs.

• "They have caused property values to plummet," said Webb Brewer from Memphis Area Legal Services, which is working with the city and county on the lawsuit. "As the property values go down, the property taxes go down. There are a lot of increased costs, like police and fire protection."

For more, see Council says OK to city lawsuit (Resolution alleges lenders targeted black community).

Go here, Go here, and Go here for other posts on alleged discrimination in real estate transactions. DiscriminationPredatoryLendingAlpha

Foreclosure Not A Basis For Tenant Evictions In San Francisco

In California, a story in San Francisco Bay Guardian serves as a reminder that, within the city of San Francisco, it's illegal for a bank or broker or anyone else to evict a tenant just because the ownership of a building changed hands, including an ownership change due to foreclosure.

• [I]n an effort to promote tenant-rights awareness, the Assessor-Recorder's Office will be circulating letters to inform tenants when a landlord has received a 'Notice of Default' — the precursor to a foreclosure.

• "According to San Francisco law," the letter says, "it is illegal for the new owner to ask you to leave without just cause or shut off your utilities." Since most of the renters who have been evicted by this latest ruse don't speak English, the letter is being circulated in English, Spanish, and Chinese.

***

• The law may seem confusing, and in some cities, a foreclosure may mean the tenants have to go. But that's not the case in San Francisco. The city's rent ordinance requires "just cause" for eviction — and a change of ownership, no matter the cause, is not in itself a just cause.

• The San Francisco Rent Board's literature makes that clear: "The Court of Appeal held in Gross v. Superior Court (1985) ... that foreclosure, like any other sale, is not a just cause for eviction under the Rent Ordinance and provides no basis to force the tenant to leave."

For the story, see Don't leave your home (A foreclosure can be tough on tenants — but it shouldn't lead to eviction).

Foreclosure Scams Growing, Continue Hitting Northern California

In Napa County, California, the St. Helena Star reports:

• Rising foreclosure rates in Napa County are supplying scam artists with a steady stream of victims. Willing to do anything to keep their homes and get out of mortgages they cannot afford, these homeowners’ desperation is fodder for deceit.

• “It’s certainly a growing problem, not just here in Napa but throughout the state and country,” Napa County District Attorney Gary Lieberstein said. “It is a reflection of the mortgage scams that we’ve seen coming around nationwide, as well as the financial status of our economy right now.”

***

• [Associate director for Fair Housing Napa Valley Steve] Cogswell said it is impossible to know how many people in Napa County have been targets of foreclosure scams. Fair Housing Napa Valley has had 55 cases in the last 12 months, but “that’s just the people that happen to end up coming in to us,” he said. Many times, the scams go unreported, either because victims don’t realize they’ve been victimized or because they don’t know where to go.

For more, see Foreclosure schemes growing.

Missouri AG Brings Civil Suit Against Homebuilder For Allegedly Pocketing Customer Cash & Either Failing To Perform Work Or Doing So In Shoddy Manner

From the Office of the Missouri Attorney General:

• The Franklin County Circuit Court has entered an order against homebuilder Jason Woods that prevents him from doing any home repair or construction in Missouri while a lawsuit brought by the Attorney General's Office is pending.

• The lawsuit,(1) filed in October, alleges that Woods, who does business as Timber Ridge Construction, took money for home repair or construction projects from consumers but then either failed to do the work or did the work in a shoddy manner.

For the Missouri AG press release, see Preliminary injunction prevents homebuilder accused of fraud from doing business while AG lawsuit is pending.

For more on homeowners left in the lurch due to actions by builders/contractors, go here, go here, go here, go here, and go here.

(1) According to the Missouri AG press release, the lawsuit alleges that Woods entered into a contract with one consumer in which Woods was paid a total of $138,951 to construct a new home on property owned by the consumer. However, Woods allegedly failed to complete the construction of the house per the specifications listed in the agreement; and the work completed was also alleged to have been done using poor workmanship. The lawsuit also alleges the defendant entered into a contract with another homeowner couple to construct a storage building on the couple's property. The couple paid Woods a total of $30,000 to construct the structure, but he failed to do so, according to the AG's press release. StiffingContractorsTheta

Massachusetts AG Continues Effort Against Housing Discrimination

Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley's Office has recently issued news releases in connection with its efforts targeting housing discrimination:

• AG Coakley Obtains Consent Judgment Against Cambridge Realty Company in Housing Discrimination Case: Resolved claims that company discriminated against a disabled Cambridge resident by refusing to rent her an apartment because it did not want to accept the lease requirements of the state-assisted housing program. The consent judgment permanently prohibits Oxford Street Realty, Inc. and its President, Jeffrey Indeck, from discriminating against tenants who have federal or state housing subsidies and requires defendants to pay the tenant $35,000 in damages.

• AG Coakley Obtains Consent Judgment Against Pittsfield Property Owner in Housing Discrimination Case: Resolves claims that Wahconah Grove Realty Trust and its property manager, Douglas Malins, violated state antidiscrimination laws by discriminating against a tenant on the basis of race. The defendants have agreed to pay $10,000 to the tenant as part of the settlement of the case. The complaint alleged that Malins prohibited a tenant’s grandson, who is biracial, from visiting her apartment and that he interfered with the tenant’s right to have African-American guests at her apartment.

• AG Coakley Obtains Consent Judgment in Sexual Harassment Case Against Property Owner and Management Company: Resolves claims against the management company and property owner of a 250-unit apartment complex in Cambridge involving allegations of unlawful discrimination against a tenant and her daughter by allowing an employee to sexually harass them.

Feds Put Squeeze On Vegas Landlords Accused Of Discriminating Against Families With Children; Tenant Gets $30K Settlement To Resolve Claims

In Las Vegas, Nevada, the Las Vegas Sun reports:

• The federal government recently settled a complaint against the owners of Las Vegas apartments who allegedly discriminated against families, the third such case in the valley in two years.

• The repeated cases involving hundreds of apartments mean “there definitely is discrimination against families with children” in the Las Vegas Valley, said Chuck Hauptman, a representative of the Housing and Urban Development Department’s San Francisco office of fair housing and equal opportunity.

• He said the agency wants valley landlords to be on notice that this is illegal, a message that’s especially crucial when families with children are among the many seeking rental housing in the wake of the valley’s foreclosure crisis.

• In the most recent case, which was settled in October, HUD, rather than the victim, had filed the complaint, indicating the alleged discrimination was flagrant and easy to prove.(1)

For the rest of the story, see U.S. strikes at landlord bias against children (HUD gets payments to families, message to apartment owners).

(1) According to the story, the allegations were resolved when the landlord agreed to pay the tenant $30,000 and to set aside money for any other victims, as well as to stop the policy of not renting to children. In another case, HUD allegations were reportedly resolved when the landlord agreed to pay $75,000 total to four families the apartment management evicted or attempted to evict. Some of the settlement money was set aside to compensate any victims who come forth in the future.

Arizona Man Faces Charges Of Pocketing Upfront Fees For Allegedly Phony Loan Modification, Foreclosure Help

In Glendale, Arizona, KNXV-TV Channel 15 reports:

• Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard announced Wednesday that a Glendale man has been indicted on charges related to a mortgage assistance scam.(1) Peoria police arrested Bobby John Herrera, 33, late Tuesday.

***

• Investigators said Herrera solicited 10 Valley homeowners facing foreclosure by making fraudulent claims that he could modify mortgage terms or provide other assistance to help them keep their homes. Herrera often charged the victims upfront fees of $1,245, according to the Attorney General's Office. The suspect is alleged to have not provided any foreclosure relief assistance or mortgage loan modifications as promised.

For more, see Attorney General: Glendale man victimized struggling homeowners.

From the Arizona Attorney General's office:

• Indictment: State of Arizona v. Herrera,
• Press Release: Glendale Man Indicted for Mortgage Loan ‘Assistance’ Scam.

(1) Herrera has been indicted on:

• one count of fraudulent schemes and artifices (ie. knowingly obtaining any benefit by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises or material omissions, pursuant to a scheme or artifice to defraud, in violation of § 13-2310, of the Arizona Revised Statutes),
• one count of money laundering (A.R.S. § 13-2317 ),
• one count of illegal control of an enterprise (A.R.S. § 13-2312(A)), and
• five counts of theft (A.R.S. § 13-1802(A)(1)).

Foreclosure Rescue Arrangement Leaves Los Angeles Homeowner Facing Eviction

In Los Angeles, California, the CBS Evening News reports:

• Alexendria Craig's house is full of memories. It was her parents' home and she inherited it when they died. A picture of her great grandfather sits on the mantle. Now she is about to lose that home after taking out a series of high interest loans that have left her hopelessly in debt.

***

• Desperate to hold onto her house, she answered a slick sounding ad that turned out to be too good to be true. Craig agreed to pay $30,000 and to share title on her house to a foreclosure rescue company. The company said it would use equity in her house to pay off her debts, and that her credit would be repaired. After a year she thought she'd get her house back.

***

• Her house is in foreclosure, and next week she's facing eviction. Both the foreclosure rescue company and the bank foreclosing on her house deny any wrongdoing.

For the story, see For Desperate Homeowners, Scams Abound (How A Company Promising Help Cost One Woman Her American Dream). Go here for video. loan modification

St. Paul Homeowner Facing Foreclosure Opts For Free City Housing Counselor For Help; Proposal From Loan Modification Firm Didn't Feel Right, She Says

In St. Paul, Minnesota, Minnesota Public Radio reports:

• When a man called Crystal Brown out of the blue promising to modify her loan, the St. Paul single working mother of three thought he was a godsend. "He was very smooth, very nice, very understanding, not critical," Brown said. "He would lead you to believe he's 100 percent on your side, like he's really fighting for you."

***

• He identified himself as an employee of KirkLand Young, a loan modification company based in Miami Beach. Brown agreed to let him fax over some paperwork, and she almost signed the contract. But once she read it, Brown saw that she would have to pay a non-refundable fee of $500. If she accepted the new mortgage, she would have to spend an additional $1,200.

***

• She said something didn't feel right about the arrangement. Brown never sent in the papers. Instead, she sought help from a foreclosure counselor with the city of St. Paul, who offered to work with the lender at no cost.

For the story, see Companies vow to change mortgage terms -- for a price (Loan-modification companies can charge thousands of dollars for this service, even though many nonprofits will do it for free. Housing advocates say the firms represent the latest form of industry predators).

Go here for the contract Crystal Brown refused to sign.

Oregon Equity Stripper Cops Plea; Now Faces Foreclosure Himself

In Portland, Oregon, Willamette Weekly reports:

• Larry Jason Somera did something a week before Christmas that rarely happens in Multnomah County Circuit Court—he pleaded guilty to a mortgage-related crime.

***

• Somera, a 35-year-old former mortgage broker, first attracted the attention of law enforcement after two 2006 home purchases from the elderly and disabled. In one deal, he and a partner bought the 1,300-square-foot Northeast Portland home of Evelyn Allen, a 73-year-old blind woman who faced foreclosure. They made a gross profit of $155,000, most of which they paid to Allen only after Allen’s family sued.

• That same year, Somera and a partner bought the St. Johns home of an 80-year-old Portland man suffering from dementia. They paid $125,000, $45,000 less than it was worth, according to court records. After the man’s financial adviser challenged the purchase in court, Somera and his partner gave the home back.

• Shen ultimately charged Somera with first-degree forgery, a Class C felony, for concocting a bogus rental agreement as collateral for the loan on a third property. [...] Somera, whose pitch in 2006 to Allen was rescue from foreclosure, now also faces the loss of his home.

For more, see Grounded Vulture (One “foreclosure-rescuer” pleads guilty in 2008. Will there be more in 2009?).

For an earlier story on this case, see Rescue Me (A Portland Cop is targeting foreclosure vultures).

San Diego-Area Foreclosure Rescue Operator Faces Felony Charges For Allegedly Screwing 17 Homeowners In 150 Year Old Land Patent Scam

In San Diego, California, KGTV Channel 10 reports:

• A man accused of stealing more than $100,000 from people in a land patent foreclosure scam pleaded not guilty Wednesday to numerous felony charges involving the 17 alleged victims. Larry Smith, 60, allegedly told people who came to his seminars that if they gave him thousands of dollars, he would help them buy a land patent so the bank couldn't foreclose on it.

***

• Five others are charged in the case with Smith, although only one has been arrested, [Deputy District Attorney Marlene] Coyne said. The prosecutor said she believes there are more people allegedly victimized by Smith, who have not yet come forward.(1)

For more, see Man Pleads Not Guilty In Alleged Foreclosure Scam.

For related KGTV Channel 10 reports on this case, see:

• December 22, 2008: Man Takes Alleged Land Patent Scheme To Other States (Larry Smith Accused Of Using 150-Year-Old Scam On Foreclosure Victims),
• July 17, 2008: I-Team Pursues Man Suspected In Land Patent Scheme.

(1) Smith was charged with conspiracy to commit grand theft, conspiracy to commit deceitful practices by a foreclosure consultant and numerous counts of grand theft.

Atlanta Man Faces Theft By Deception Charges For Allegedly Taking Money From 11 Homeowners Facing Foreclosure, Failing To Deilver On Promises

In Atlanta, Georgia, Fox5 News reports that a man who made money off of people about to lose their homes to foreclosure has been arrested.

Dwayne Green, of Maximus Investment Group, has been charged with one felony count of theft by deception for taking $18,000 from one homeowner facing foreclosure, and one misdemeanor count of theft by deception for pocketing lesser amounts from ten other financially strapped homeowners. He failed to deliver on promises to help save homeowners out of foreclosure.

For the story (video only), see I-Team Maximus Arrest. loan modification

Mortgage Payoff "To Do" List

In a recent Q&A column, attorney/syndicated real estate writer Benny L. Kass gives this "to do" list when paying off a mortgage:

1. Make sure that your mortgage/deed of trust is formally released from the land records in the county where your house is located. Ask your former lender to confirm that they arranged for this release (If you are having trouble determining whether the release/satisfaction was filed, the local recorder of deeds may be of assistance.),
2. You should get your original promissory note and deed of trust returned to you, marked "paid and cancelled;"(1)
3. Advise your county real estate tax office to start sending you the real estate tax bills;
4. For those who had automatic bank withdrawals to pay your mortgage, make sure to stop these payments immediately.

For those of you looking to take advantage of the current low fixed rate mortgages available and are thinking of refinancing, you might want to keep the foregoing points in mind.

Source: Real Estate Mailbag (last Q&A in the article).

(1) I wonder how many homeowners actually realize that they are entitled to get back their original promissory note. Also, I wonder how many would be successful in getting back their original note nowadays, given that many of the geniuses in the mortgage industry (ie. lenders, servicers, securitizers, Wall Street wizards, etc.) never bothered to physically keep track of the loan documents after the mortgage was consummated, and have no clue whether they actually lost them, or simply forgot where they stashed them (possibly in a dumpster).

For an example of how clueless some in the mortgage industry are, see The Associated Press: American Home under fire over loan files, where a mortgage lender, through its legal counsel, makes an idiotic request of a bankruptcy court for permission to actually dump the original documents for 490,000 mortgage loans. KappaMtgDocsMissing

Difficulty Tracing Title To Home Involving Securitized Foreclosed Mortgage Stalls House Closing

In Minneapolis, Minnesota, FOX9 reports:

• A Twin Cities couple is hoping to turn a foreclosed home into a home, but it has not been easy. Three different closing dates have fallen through. [...] In the Waite Park neighborhood in northeast Minneapolis, a little cottage on Benjamin Street has been sitting empty since spring. Heather Playman and her husband would love to buy it. In fact, they even have a purchase agreement, picking it up two months ago for a relative steal at $165,000.

• But the bank won't close on the deal. The problem is with the paperwork: the title and the deed. Wachovia used to own the house, now it's Fannie Mae. The city of Minneapolis says it’s a common problem that keeps hundreds of homes in limbo. "Many mortgages were bought and sold between lenders over and over again and it is difficult to trace the title."(1)

For more, see Bank Ownership of Foreclosed Homes Causing Confusion (Closing dates missed on NE Minneapolis home owned by Fannie Mae).

(1) Given the gigantic mess created by the mortgage lending industry in this regard, I wonder how many in the title insurance industry (ie. underwriters, agents, closers, etc.) there are who are having a problem insuring the titles to homes that have a recent foreclosure appearing in the chain of title. Based on this story, there apparently is at least one who's having a problem. Are there any others??? KappaMtgDocsMissing

Colorado Man Cops Plea To One Count Of Forgery In Alleged Mortgage Scam; Gets Free Pass From Prosecution In Cases Involving 15 Other Properties

In Weld County, Colorado, the Greeley Tribune reports:

• A Greeley man who holds himself out as a real estate broker and builder and is a defendant in a civil fraud case(1) pleaded guilty to forgery [...] in exchange for immunity on other mortgage crimes. Ernest Salazar Jr., 49, pleaded to the felony [...] and faces from one to three years behind bars.

***

• Weld District Attorney Ken Buck said he will ask for jail time but would not discuss specifics. He said he had been talking with Salazar’s attorney prior to the grand jury indictment against Salazar, and agreed to pursue only one felony charge. “I think that our resources are best spent pursuing the other targets we have identified,” Buck said. “I’d say stay tuned.” Buck said he couldn’t elaborate about who else may have been involved.

• Salazar said he would plead guilty to forgery if the Weld District Attorney’s Office agreed not to pursue charges in cases involving 15 properties(2) he worked with through his businesses, Sunset Construction, Sunrise Mortgage, A-1 Action Construction and All-Pro Mortgage.

For more, see Greeley man pleads in forgery case in deal with Weld DA.

(1) According to the story, the civil case against Salazar was filed in February, and alleges that he defrauded a man and other property owners in a series of real estate flipping schemes throughout Greeley and Windsor, designed to either steal equity, use others’ credit to obtain loans and skim off the top, and flat out steal money. Reportedly, the civil suit claims that the damage done to individual investors exceeds $800,000.

(2) Salazar's ostensibly sweet plea bargain may have possibly been obtained as a result of his "winning the race to the prosecutor's office" - which has been described as a natural phenomenon that arises whenever the government has multiple targets in its crosshairs. In this case, Salazar, the first "fish" to get to the prosecutor, negotiates a great plea deal for himself in exchange for an agreement to "sing" against the other "fish" (ie. his confederates in the alleged scam). The more "fish" Salazar can help the prosecutor "reel in" (through convictions), the less time he'll have to spend in the "frying pan" (ie. prison) when the "fish fry" takes place (ie. sentencing day).

Using Statute Of Limitations To Wipe Out Lenders' Right To Foreclose A Mortgage?

In a recent story on MSNBC.com profiling Florida consumer foreclosure attorney April Charney and her approach to defending homeowners facing foreclosure, a point was made on the possible use of the statute of limitations to terminate a foreclosing lender's right to foreclose:

• Charney said that in a number of her cases, once there is no longer an ability for the loan servicer to profit, the foreclosure “just goes to sleep, and unless I’m going to pursue it, nobody’s setting hearings, nobody’s pursuing anything to get it to trial.”

• After five years, which is the statute of limitations to enforce a contract in Florida,(1) she can try to help her clients own their homes mortgage-free, Charney said. The first opportunity for her to help clients do that may arise next year.

• And that legal limbo is where the lion’s share of her cases stand now, Charney said. So far this year, she has achieved two “workouts” and lost two cases. “Many, many, many” of the rest are in sleep mode or getting a single filing each year by plaintiffs’ attorneys just to keep them alive.

For the story, see 'Angel' of foreclosure defense bedevils lenders (Florida attorney trains hundreds of others to help troubled borrowers) (for the entire story on one web page, try here).

(1) Sec. 95.11(2)(c), 95.281(1)(a), Florida Statutes. KappaMtgDocsMissing

Lack Of Diligence Means Another Process Server Screw-Up, Another Void Foreclosure

A 2006 decision of a Florida appeals court adds a little fuel to the fire for those who believe that screw-ups by process servers (as well as attorneys for foreclosing lenders who, contrary to what they may think, have some responsibility for supervising the actions of a process server) in the course of serving homeowners with the lawsuit paperwork (ie. summons and complaint) in foreclosure proceedings are not all that uncommon.

The case involved a permanent resident of Canada who owned a second home in Spring Hill, Florida, and who was facing foreclosure on that home. At the time of the attempted service of process, the home was unoccupied. Because the process server couldn't find the homeowner after a couple of attempts at the premises, and an attempt at a second location, a decision was made to serve the homeowner by publication of a legal notice in the local newspaper.(1)

In reversing the lower court and deciding that service of process was no good in this case, the court ruled that the process server failed to meet the minimum requirements for conducting a "diligent search and inquiry" for the whereabouts of the homeowner prior to resorting to service by publication.(2)

For the details on the process server's lack of diligence in conducting a search and inquiry in connection with the homeowner's whereabouts in this case (sorry, no "easy-to-read" media report for this story; court decision only), see Godsell v. United Guar. Residential Ins., 923 So. 2d 1209; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3884; 31 Fla. L. Weekly D 812 (5th DCA 2006).

Go here for other posts on foreclosures involving faulty notifications to property owners.

Go here for other posts on process server screw ups.

(1) Pursuant to Sections 49.021-.041, Florida Statutes.

(2) The court indicated that the plaintiff must prove that it made “an honest and conscientious effort, reasonably appropriate to the circumstances, to acquire the information necessary to fully comply with the controlling statutes,” and that "it is basic that to constitute diligent search and inquiry to discover the whereabouts of a party, that inquiry should be made of persons likely or presumed to known [sic] such whereabouts." foreclosure faulty notice ScrewUpProcessServing

Attorney Malpractice For Obtaining Loan Modification From Lender Who Can't Prove It Owns The Promissory Note?

An article in the Decenber, 2008 issue of Trial Magazine highlights problems faced by lenders as a result of the mortgage securitization process that leaves them in a difficult spot whether they're attempting a foreclosure action against, or a loan modification with, a financially strapped homeowner. It also raises a question regarding an attorney's professional responsibility when representing a homeowner in these situations.

• [B]ecause of lenders’ bundling and reselling of mortgages, [promissory] notes are often lost, misplaced, or corrupted. As a result, many lenders can’t prove that they are owed payments and entitled to foreclose.

***

• “Losing a note is like losing cash,” said Mitchell Roth, a lawyer in Sherman Oaks, California. “The right to payment depends, with limited exceptions, upon the actual possession of the note. To defend against a foreclosure, the first line of defense is, ‘Show me the note.’ And show me how you have the right to payment under the note by proper endorsement or assignment.”

***

• Roth said confusion about the note holder is one reason lawyers should counsel their clients to avoid loan workouts or other negotiations offered by their banks or mortgage companies.

• “Why should we renegotiate unless we know that we are negotiating with the actual holder of the note?” he said. “In fact, I think lawyers are committing malpractice if they are negotiating with an entity that is not the original holder in due course in possession of the instrument.”

For more, see Homeowners bank on new ways to fight foreclosures (article reproduced and appearing on the website of The Consumer Warning Network).

In related posts, see:

• 12-29-08: Foreclosing Lender Can't Prove Ownership Of The Note? So What's The Big Deal???,
• 12-28-08: Judges, Homeowner Attorneys Begin To Wonder How To Do A Loan Modification When Lender Can't Prove Ownership Of Promissory Note?KappaMtgDocsMissing

Federal Prison Sentences Expected To Get Stiffer As Tanking Real Estate Market Drives Up Lenders' Losses From Mortgage Fraud

Buried in a recent story in the South Florida Sun Sentinel is an observation that prison sentences in federal mortgage fraud prosecutions will begin becoming stiffer than they have been:

• [U]ntil now, the punishments meted out to mortgage fraud offenders have been relatively mild — usually less than five years' imprisonment and sometimes nothing more than probation.

• That's because under federal sentencing guidelines, penalities in such cases are tied to the amount of documented financial loss. When home prices were climbing, fraudsters generally paid off their loans and lenders had no direct losses.

• Now the foreclosure crisis is driving up losses, resulting in stiffer punishment. In [one recent] case, prosecutors and defense lawyers agreed [a mortgage scam defendant's] crimes cost lenders at least $1 million because many of the properties he purchased were subsequently foreclosed on at a loss [he received eight years in prison].

Source: Mortgage fraud cases in South Florida might bring stiffer sentences (Judge imposes 8-year term, saying he wants to deter others).

HELOC Freeze Puts Squeeze On Family's College Tuition Plans

In Algonquin, Illinois, the Chicago Sun Times reports:

• Jim and Cindy Ranallo are determined to give their two sons one thing they don't have: a four-year college degree. But the home equity line of credit they were relying on to get both boys through school was unexpectedly frozen by JPMorgan Chase weeks before their elder son's recent tuition payment was due.

***

• The Ranallos' situation is a familiar one for hundreds of thousands of Americans who have found their home equity credit lines frozen or reduced this year. Their struggle to send their children to college also is familiar to parents patching funds together for higher education, constantly worried they will come up short.

***

• Hysterical after opening the bank's letter, Cindy Ranallo feared her son would be kicked out of school because they couldn't afford it. A [college] official reassured the Ranallos that they would find a way for their son to stay, offering additional student loans, which the family accepted.

For more, see Frozen home equity loan hurts family (ECONOMY'S VICTIMS: Freezing of home equity loan threatens to kill Algonquin family's dream of sending sons to college).

The U.S. Office of Thrift Supervision recently issued a six-page letter of guidance which generally explains what obligations lenders have in connection with the freezing of home-equity lines of credit [HELOCs].

Go here for other posts on Frozen HELOCs.

More On Anticipated Home Mortgage "Cram Downs" In Bankruptcy

The Wall Street Journal reports:

• Mortgage lenders who wake up Thursday with a New Year's hangover are likely to face another headache soon: The effort to give bankruptcy judges the power to rewrite mortgages is gaining steam.

• The banking industry hoped the mortgage "cram-down"(1) measure died when Congress removed it from the $700 billion bailout bill that passed in October. But it has been gathering momentum in Democrat-controlled Washington, as evidence emerges that current voluntary foreclosure-prevention programs are falling short.

***

• "It is absolutely clear that voluntary modification is just not working," says Rep. Brad Miller, a North Carolina Democrat. "Every plan that Congress has passed, we do it and nothing happens."

For more, see Mortgage 'Cram-Downs' Loom as Foreclosures Mount (may require subscription; if no subscription, go here - then click link for the story).

(1) In a cram-down, a judge modifies a loan, often reducing principal so a borrower can afford it. Lenders hate it because they have to absorb the loss. Bankruptcy judges currently have the ability to modify certain personal loans and even mortgages on vacation homes, but they can not cram-down mortgages on primary residences.

Lenders Accused In Housing Court Of Dumping Blighted Foreclosures Onto Real Estate Market Shop For Friendlier Forum; Move Cases To Federal Court

In Cleveland, Ohio, The Washington Independent reports:

• The fight that neighborhoods in Cleveland are launching against banks that dump vacant and vandalized foreclosed homes back onto the real estate market received a bit of a setback, [...]. A private, non-profit housing advocacy group had filed suit in local housing court to force the banks to clean up their properties before selling them, or to demolish them entirely. But the banks - Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo - convinced a judge to move the suit to federal court.

***

• The move to federal court is more than just an arcane legal development. The neighborhood group wants the case heard in housing court because it validates what has become increasingly clear in the foreclosure crisis: Banks are property owners, with all the responsibilities that come with it. As they foreclose on houses and their inventories of bank-owned properties swell, banks try to dodge this reality by blaming servicers and paying lawyers to get them out of housing court.

• The same thing happened in Cincinnati recently, where the local legal aid agency filed suit in housing court, but the case was moved to a federal court instead.

For more, see Banks with Deep Pockets Dodge Foreclosure Damages.

See also, Lawsuit Targets Banks With Novel Tactic (Advocacy Group Takes Grievances to Housing Court):

• [C]leveland and other cities are “looking at old bodies of law to address new problems,” [University of Connecticut law professor] Patricia McCoy said, because they are trying to fight foreclosures with any tools they can. Cleveland has taken legal action previously over foreclosures. The city in January sued 21 investment banks, including Wells Fargo and Deutsche Bank, and accused them of creating and enabling the subprime crisis. The suit was filed in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas court. The latest suit differs in that it was filed in housing court. BetaVacantForeclosure

Connecticut Warns Consumers Against Unsolicited Mortgage, Credit Card Debt Assistance; False Offers Of Help Are A "Scavenger Hunt" Says State AG

From the Office of the Connecticut Attorney General:

• Attorney General Richard Blumenthal issued an urgent consumer warning [last week] about unsolicited calls to consumers offering reduced rates on mortgages or credit card debt.

***

• "Our advice to consumers: hang up on unsolicited offers," Blumenthal said. "This scam victimizes our most vulnerable citizens -- homeowners desperate to save their families and escape financial ruin. This reprehensible ruse -- false promises of reduced rates on mortgage and debt -- is actually a scavenger hunt for private, personal information on consumers that may be illegally exploited. Consumers who divulge details hopeful for better lives will find only deeper financial ruin."

For the Connecticut AG press release, see Attorney General Issues Consumer Alert On Mortgage And Debt Rescue Scam. loan modification

Loan Modification Services Prohibited In Vermont Unless Licensed, Say State Officials

In Montpelier, Vermont, The Burlington Free Press reports:

• Homeowners having trouble making mortgage payments or facing foreclosure should be cautious when offers of assistance come unsolicited, requiring up-front fees, or are high-pressure sells, officials for the Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration said.

• (BISHCA) has received inquiries and complaints about so-called foreclosure “rescue” services. While it is not inherently illegal to offer these services, the person doing it must be licensed with BISHCA as a lender, mortgage broker, or debt adjuster, said BISHCA officials.

For the story, see State: Be wary of foreclosure rescue services.

More On Philly Deed Theft Problem

In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, The Intelligencer reports:

• [P]hiladelphia has become a hot spot for deed theft in the past couple of years, said [Montgomery County Recorder of Deeds Nancy J.] Becker. She recalled an incident where homeowners left for their winter home in Florida only to return to the city in the spring to find all of their furniture and possessions gone and a family living in their home who thought they had rightfully bought the property.

• “In Philadelphia, it's so bad that the president judge designated two judges, and all they hear is land-fraud charges.”

For more, see New law helps limit deed fraud.

For an old NBC10 (Philadelphia) television story in which investigative reporter Lu Ann Cahn "steals" the homes of Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, as well as the homes of the Philadelphia mayor and the Pennsylvania Speaker of the House of Representatives to highlight the deed theft problem in Philadelphia, see Stolen Homes.

Go here, Go here, go here, go here, and go here for other posts related to deed or refinancing scams by forgery, swindle, etc. KappaDeedTheft

Shelby County Commisioners Give Go-Ahead For Filing Race Bias, Predatory Lending Suit Against Major Lenders

In Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Commercial Appeal reports:

• Shelby County commissioners approved a resolution [last week] authorizing the county to file suit against the national lenders who, officials say, gave out risky, high-interest rate loans and enabled a foreclosure crisis in Shelby County.

• The resolution alleges that these major national lenders engaged in "deceptive" and "discriminatory" lending practices targeted at the black community. And the resulting foreclosure epidemic has destabilized neighborhoods, eroded property values and damaged the tax base -- costing county and Memphis city government millions in tax revenues.

***

• Webb Brewer, the director of advocacy for Memphis Area Legal Services, who will help the city and county prosecute, said the 10 or so national banks that gave out the most predatory loans will most likely be named.

For more, see Shelby commissioners authorize lawsuits against mortgage lenders (Resolution says loans targeted minorities, forced foreclosures).

See also, Memphis Daily News: Details Coming Soon for Lender Lawsuit.

Go here, Go here, and Go here for other posts on alleged race bias in real estate transactions. DiscriminationPredatoryLendingAlpha

1031 Exchange Intermediary Suspected Of Feloniously Pocketing $550K+ In Clients' Sale Proceeds Found Dead By Suicide

In Boulder Colorado, the Boulder Daily Camera reports:

• [K.C.] Schneider, who owns a commercial real estate firm in Boulder, said Wednesday he is [...] out $425,000 in real estate proceeds he gave National 1031 Exchange Service to hold while he closed on a new property.

***

• Schneider filed a complaint in October against the now-defunct holding company's owner, Debra Edwards, and earlier this month Boulder police issued a warrant for her arrest on suspicion of three felony counts of theft of more than $20,000.

• But the day before Edwards was to surrender to authorities, the 53-year-old certified public accountant and former board member of the Longmont Area Chamber of Commerce was found dead in her Longmont office. The Boulder County Coroner's Office said Wednesday that her Dec. 15 death was a suicide -- asphyxiation due to inhalation of helium.

• Edwards' death led Boulder police to close its criminal case against her. Schneider said that leaves him and two other National 1031 Exchange Service clients -- who also claim to have been bilked of tens of thousands of dollars -- out in the cold.

For more, see Suicide complicates money-recovery effort (Client says Debra Edwards' Boulder financial firm stole $425,000 from him).

Go here for other posts on problems with 1031 exchange intermediaries.

Go here, Go here, Go here, and Go here for other stories of trust account / escrow account theft of funds. EscrowRipOffAlpha

S. Florida Man, Others Charged With Using Unwitting Mother-In-Law's I.D. & Submitting Simultaneous HELOC Applications To Suck The Equity From Her Home

The U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami, Florida announced the return of a five count grand jury indictment charging eight participants(1) with a bank fraud scheme that resulted in the approval and disbursement of two home equity loans, totaling approximately $1 million. The U.S. Attorney's office said:

• According to the indictment, "Benny" Benach [and three others] decided to submit simultaneous applications for fraudulent home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”) to Bank of America and Wachovia for the total amount of $1 million, requesting $500,000 from each bank. Each HELOC application listed Benach’s mother-in-law as the purported borrower, and a home owned by Benach’s mother-in-law as the collateral. To prepare and process the HELOC applications, Benach’s mother-in-law’s name and social security number were used without her knowledge, input or authority. [...] At the time of the submission of the fraudulent HELOC applications, neither bank was made aware of the other pending HELOC application.

Among the participants charged were employees of the lenders who allegedly accepted and processed bogus loan applications.

For more, see Two Bank Insiders And Six Others Charged In Bank Fraud Scheme To Defraud Bank Of America And Wachovia Of $1M.

Go here, go here, go here, go here, and go here for other posts related to deed or refinancing scams by forgery, swindle, etc.

(1) Charged were Bienvenido “Benny” Benach, Jr., Ramon Puentes, Danny Flores, Rolando Alfonso, Jorge Nobrega, Jorge Arrieta, Sebastian Kishinevsky, and Adriana Cruz. KappaDeedTheft