Recovering Damages From Those Engaged In The Unauthorized Practice Of Law

A recent story in The Florida Bar News may be of interest to those in Florida who have suffered monetary damages when doing business with individuals and companies whose activities constitute the unauthorized practice of law (which could include non-attorney loan modification firms engaged in providing forensic loan audits in search of violations of relevant lending and consumer protection laws):

• Florida residents have legal recourses when they have been damaged by those committing the unlicensed practice of law, according to The Florida Bar. The Bar has provided the above response to a request from the Supreme Court, which is considering an appeal from the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Goldberg v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation, 981 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

• The appeal is two consolidated class action cases where the plaintiffs sued alleging that corporations engaged in the unlicensed practice of law when they prepared closing documents and other paperwork in connection with mortgages. The Fourth DCA dismissed the case, saying the plaintiffs could not seek civil remedies absent the finding by the Supreme Court of unlicensed practice of law.

• The case was appealed to the high court, which in turn asked the Bar’s unlicensed practice of law office for an amicus brief “focusing on the existence and adequacy of remedies that may be available to those claiming to have been harmed by persons engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.”

For more, see Damaged by UPL? The Bar argues the public has a right to redress.

Go here for The Florida Bar's amicus brief.

Go here for links to all the briefs filed in this case (scroll down to case #SC08-1360 Goldberg, et al. v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation, et al.).

Go here for information on Filing an Unlicensed Practice of Law Complaint with The Florida Bar. UnauthPractOfLawTheta