GMAC's Embarrassment Over Publicity Surrounding "Robosigner" Practices Not Enough To Kibosh Dissemination Of Troubling Maine Deposition Over Internet

GMAC's embarrassment over the recent dissemination of a certain deposition revealing its troubling "robosigner" practices was one of the highlights in Maine state court Judge Keith A. Powers' denial of the company's attempt to cover up the contents therein from the public(1) by requesting a protective order, as he sets forth in the following excerpt from page 3 of his September 24, 2010 ruling:

• Stephan's deposition was taken to advance a legitimate purpose, and the testimony elicited has direct probative value to this dispute. Attorney Cox did not himself take action other than to share the deposition transcript with an attorney in Florida.
  
  That the testimony reveals corporate practices that GMAC finds embarrassing is not enough to justify issuance of a protective order. Further, Plaintiff has failed to establish that GMAC has been harmed specifically as a result of the dissemination of the June 7, 2010 transcript, given that similarly embarrassing deposition testimony from Stephan's December 10, 2009 Florida deposition also appears on the Internet, and will remain even were this court to grant Plaintiff's motion.
  
  Accordingly, because Plaintiff has failed to establish its burden of persuasion [...], its Motion of Entry of Protective Order is denied.

For the entire ruling, see Order - FNMA v. Bradbury.

(1) See Mother Jones: Did GMAC Try to Bury Its Foreclosure Smoking Gun? (The deposition the lender really, really doesn't want you to see).