Wells Fargo, Upstate NY Foreclosure Mill To Face The Heat In Explaining Dubious Documents Filed In Foreclosure Matter
Attorney Abigail Field writes at AOL's Daily Finance:
- The banks' constant refrain during this mortgage mess is that the paperwork issues are mere technicalities -- nothing to be concerned about. The documents are all true, they assert, we just didn't honor the proper procedures.
- But it doesn't take much digging into the issue to find a case like that of Tandala Mims of New York, which calls into question the whole foreclosure process and the systems that support it. In Mims's case, which will be argued again on Thursday, her lawyer, consumer bankruptcy attorney Linda Tirelli, argues that Wells Fargo should not be able to foreclose during Mims's bankruptcy because the bank's documents claiming ownership of the mortgage appear to be false in several
ways.(1)
For more, see A Foreclosure Fiasco: The Case of Tandala Mims v. Wells Fargo.
(1) See In re Mims - Objection To Motion for Automatic Relief From Automatic Stay etc. etc. for bankruptcy attorney Linda Tirelli's motion setting forth the ostensible indicators of fraud in the filed foreclosure documents in the matter being litigated.
The motion features the activities of prolific robosigner John Kennerty; the outfit listed as representing the lender in this case is the notorious, Buffalo, NY-based foreclosure mill Office of Steven J. Baum, P.C.).
No comments:
Post a Comment